OV - exec - Loop 757

	Loop Id: 757	Module: exec	Source: par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822	Coverage: 0.03%

0x4382e0 LDP	X15, X18, [X30, #1016]    [1]

0x4382e4 LDR	D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]    [4]

0x4382e8 SUBS	X3, X3, #2

0x4382ec ADD	X30, X30, #16

0x4382f0 LDUR	D3, [X23, #504]    [3]

0x4382f4 FMUL	D0, D0, D3

0x4382f8 LDR	X15, [X21, X15,LSL #3]    [2]

0x4382fc LDR	D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x438300 FADD	D2, D2, D0

0x438304 FADD	D1, D1, D0

0x438308 FADD	D3, D0, D3

0x43830c STR	D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x438310 LDR	X15, [X21, X18,LSL #3]    [2]

0x438314 LDR	D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]    [4]

0x438318 LDR	D3, [X23], #16    [3]

0x43831c FMUL	D0, D0, D3

0x438320 LDR	D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x438324 FADD	D2, D2, D0

0x438328 FADD	D1, D1, D0

0x43832c FADD	D3, D0, D3

0x438330 STR	D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x438334 B.NE	4382e0

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_multi_interp.c: 1816 - 1822

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1816:                   for (k=P_diag_i[j1]; k < P_diag_i[j1+1]; k++)

1817:                   {

1818:                  k1 = P_diag_j[k];

1819:                      alfa = A_diag_data[j]*P_diag_data[k];

1820:                      P_diag_data[tmp_array[k1]] += alfa;

1821:                      sum_C += alfa;

1822:                      sum_N += alfa;

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►99.15+	__kmp_invoke_microtask	libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func	libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread	libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)	libomp.so
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	thread_start	libc.so.6

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.37
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19
Source	par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	4.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.92
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	2.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.75
P3 cycles	0.75
P4 cycles	0.75
P5 cycles	0.75
P6 cycles	2.50
P7 cycles	2.50
P8 cycles	2.50
P9 cycles	2.50
P10 cycles	3.67
P11 cycles	3.67
P12 cycles	3.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	22.00
Nb uops	22.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	6.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.37
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19
Source	par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	4.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.92
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	2.75
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.75
P3 cycles	0.75
P4 cycles	0.75
P5 cycles	0.75
P6 cycles	2.50
P7 cycles	2.50
P8 cycles	2.50
P9 cycles	2.50
P10 cycles	3.67
P11 cycles	3.67
P12 cycles	3.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	22.00
Nb uops	22.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	6.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	2.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19
Source file and lines	par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/parcsr_ls/par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 4.00 to 1.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

6: addition or subtraction
2: multiply

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	22
nb uops	22
loop length	88
used w registers	0
used x registers	9
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	4
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.75 cycles
front end	2.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.75
Dispatch	3.67
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	4.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 4.00 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4382e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDP X15, X18, [X30, #1016]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	1	N/A
LDR D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
SUBS X3, X3, #2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X30, X30, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDUR D3, [X23, #504]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X15, [X21, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D2, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D1, D1, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D3, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR X15, [X21, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X23], #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D2, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D1, D1, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D3, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
B.NE 4382e0 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19+0x6b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19
Source file and lines	par_multi_interp.c:1816-1822
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 4.00 to 1.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 8 FP arithmetical operations:

6: addition or subtraction
2: multiply

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	22
nb uops	22
loop length	88
used w registers	0
used x registers	9
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	4
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	3.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.75 cycles
front end	2.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	2.50	2.50	2.50	2.50	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.75
Dispatch	3.67
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	4.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 4.00 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4382e0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDP X15, X18, [X30, #1016]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	1	N/A
LDR D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
SUBS X3, X3, #2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X30, X30, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDUR D3, [X23, #504]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X15, [X21, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D2, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D1, D1, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D3, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR X15, [X21, X18,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR D0, [X24, X16,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X23], #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D2, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D1, D1, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D3, D0, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X27, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
B.NE 4382e0 <hypre_BoomerAMGBuildMultipass.omp_outlined.19+0x6b0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code