OV - exec - Loop 3120

0x5120ec LDR	X16, [X20, X1,LSL #3]    [1]

0x5120f0 UBFM	X5, X16, #61, #60

0x5120f4 LDR	X6, [X19, X5]    [3]

0x5120f8 CMP	X4, X6

0x5120fc B.EQ	512424

0x512100 STR	X4, [X19, X5]    [3]

0x512104 ADD	X1, X1, #1

0x512108 ADD	X17, X17, #1

0x51210c LDR	X3, [X11]    [2]

0x512110 CMP	X1, X3

0x512114 B.LT	5120ec

0x512424 ADD	X1, X1, #1

0x512428 CMP	X1, X3

0x51242c B.LT	5120ec

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c: 225 - 231

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

225: 	   for (ib = B_i[ja]; ib < B_i[ja+1]; ib++)

226: 	   {

227: 	      jb = B_j[ib];

228: 	      if (B_marker[jb] != ic)

229: 	      {

230: 	 	 B_marker[jb] = ic;

231: 		 num_nonzeros++;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.64+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.36+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.22
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.25
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.25
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.31
Front-end cycles	1.19
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.13
P3 cycles	1.13
P4 cycles	1.13
P5 cycles	1.13
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.08
P11 cycles	0.92
P12 cycles	1.00
P13 cycles	0.25
P14 cycles	0.25
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.50
Nb uops	9.50
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.50
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.50
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P10,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.38
Front-end cycles	1.38
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.25
P3 cycles	1.25
P4 cycles	1.25
P5 cycles	1.25
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.50
P11 cycles	1.17
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	0.50
P14 cycles	0.50
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	11.00
Nb uops	11.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.50
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue, P0, P1, P2, P3, P4, P5,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:225-231
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.25
Front-end cycles	1.00
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	0.67
P11 cycles	0.67
P12 cycles	0.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	8.00
Nb uops	8.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	1.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.25 to 0.31 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with fassociative-math (included in Ofast or ffast-math) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	9.50
nb uops	9.50
loop length	38
used w registers	0
used x registers	9
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	1.19 cycles
front end	1.19 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.13	1.13	1.13	1.13	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.08	0.92	1.00	0.25	0.25
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.13	1.13	1.13	1.13	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.08	0.92	1.00	0.25	0.25

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.19
Dispatch	1.25
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.25

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.25 cycles.

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 0.37 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with fassociative-math (included in Ofast or ffast-math) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	11
nb uops	11
loop length	44
used w registers	0
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.38 cycles
front end	1.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.38
Dispatch	1.50
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 5120ec

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X16, [X20, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
UBFM X5, X16, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X6, [X19, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X4, X6	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.EQ 512424 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x464>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
STR X4, [X19, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X17, X17, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X3, [X11]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	N/A
CMP X1, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 5120ec <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x12c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:225-231
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:225-231.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.00 to 0.25 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with fassociative-math (included in Ofast or ffast-math) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	8
nb uops	8
loop length	32
used w registers	0
used x registers	8
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.00 cycles
front end	1.00 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.67	0.67	0.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.00
Dispatch	1.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.00

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.00 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.00 to 0.67 cycles (1.50x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 5120ec

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X16, [X20, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
UBFM X5, X16, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X6, [X19, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X4, X6	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.EQ 512424 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x464>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADD X1, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X1, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 5120ec <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x12c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code