OV - exec - Function hypre

	Function: hypre_Rand	Module: exec	Source: random.c:76-116 [...]	Coverage (incl. loops): 0.12% \| (excl. loops): 0.12%

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/utilities/random.c: 76 - 116

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

76:    high = Seed / q;

77:    low = Seed % q;

78:    test = a * low - r * high;

[...]

85:       Seed = test + m;

[...]

115:    return ((HYPRE_Real)(hypre_RandI()) / m);

116: }

0x52bfe4 ADRP	X5,

0x52bfe8 MOVZ	X0, #64377

0x52bfec LDR	X4, [X5, #744]

0x52bff0 MOVK	X0, #8163

0x52bff4 MOVZ	X1, #62237

0x52bff8 MOVK	X0, #1455

0x52bffc MOVK	X1, #1

0x52c000 MOVK	X0, #16807

0x52c004 MOVN	X7, #2835

0x52c008 MOVZ	X3, #32

0x52c00c MOVZ	X6, #16807

0x52c010 MOVK	X3, #15872

0x52c014 ORR	X2, XZR, #0x7fffffff

0x52c018 SMULH	X8, X4, X0

0x52c01c FMOV	D31, X3

0x52c020 SBFM	X9, X8, #15, #63

0x52c024 SUB	X10, X9, X4,ASR #63

0x52c028 MSUB	X11, X10, X1, X4

0x52c02c MUL	X12, X10, X7

0x52c030 MADD	X13, X11, X6, X12

0x52c034 CMP	X13, #0

0x52c038 ADD	X14, X13, X2

0x52c03c CSEL	X15, X14, X13, #13

0x52c040 SCVTF	D0, X15

0x52c044 STR	X15, [X5, #744]

0x52c048 FMUL	D0, D0, D31

0x52c04c RET

0x52c050 HINT	#0

0x52c054 HINT	#0

0x52c058 HINT	#0

0x52c05c HINT	#0

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.02+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►6.98+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.98+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►6.02+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.68+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.32+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.86+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.14+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.94+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.06+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►91.76+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►8.24+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.02+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►6.98+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►91.86+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►8.14+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.05+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.95+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.94+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.06+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►92.86+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:612	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►7.14+	hypre_BoomerAMGCoarsenPMIS	par_coarsen.c:2186	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:638	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.12% of application time for run 1x1

Source file and lines	random.c:76-116
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/utilities/random.c:76-78,85,115-116.

Warnings:

Ignoring paths for analysis
Failed to get the number of paths

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your function is not vectorized. Only 28% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By vectorizing your function, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 5.50 to 4.25 cycles (1.29x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

SCVTF: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/utilities/random.c:115

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 1 FP arithmetical operations:

1: multiply

The binary function does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	31
nb uops	27
loop length	124
used w registers	0
used x registers	17
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	2
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.38 cycles
front end	3.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.50	0.50
cycles	0.50	0.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.38
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	5.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
other	0%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	28%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
other	30%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	28%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	30%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 5.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 52bfe4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADRP X5, <570fe4>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVZ X0, #64377	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X4, [X5, #744]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #8163	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X1, #62237	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #1455	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #16807	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVN X7, #2835	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X3, #32	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X6, #16807	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X3, #15872	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X2, XZR, #0x7fffffff	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SMULH X8, X4, X0	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D31, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SBFM X9, X8, #15, #63	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (100.0%)
SUB X10, X9, X4,ASR #63	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MSUB X11, X10, X1, X4	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
MUL X12, X10, X7	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MADD X13, X11, X6, X12	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
CMP X13, #0	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X14, X13, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CSEL X15, X14, X13, #13	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SCVTF D0, X15	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (25.0%)
STR X15, [X5, #744]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
RET	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A

The code analyzed by CQA in that panel excludes loops and represents 0.12% of application time for run 1x1

Source file and lines	random.c:76-116
Module	exec

The function is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/utilities/random.c:76-78,85,115-116.

Warnings:

Ignoring paths for analysis
Failed to get the number of paths

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized function can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Make array accesses unit-stride:
- If your function streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Conversion instructions

Detected expensive conversion instructions.

Details

SCVTF: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/utilities/random.c:115

Workaround

Avoid mixing data with different types. In particular, check if the type of constants is the same as array elements.

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

The binary function is composed of 1 FP arithmetical operations:

1: multiply

The binary function does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	31
nb uops	27
loop length	124
used w registers	0
used x registers	17
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	2
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.38 cycles
front end	3.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.50	0.50
cycles	0.50	0.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	5.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.83	0.50	0.67	0.50	0.50

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.38
Dispatch	5.50
Overall L1	5.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
other	0%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	28%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
other	30%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

INT+FP

all	28%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	30%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each call to the function takes 5.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the function is: 52bfe4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADRP X5, <570fe4>	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MOVZ X0, #64377	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X4, [X5, #744]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	0	0	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #8163	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X1, #62237	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #1455	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X0, #16807	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVN X7, #2835	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X3, #32	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X6, #16807	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVK X3, #15872	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ORR X2, XZR, #0x7fffffff	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SMULH X8, X4, X0	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D31, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SBFM X9, X8, #15, #63	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (100.0%)
SUB X10, X9, X4,ASR #63	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MSUB X11, X10, X1, X4	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
MUL X12, X10, X7	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
MADD X13, X11, X6, X12	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
CMP X13, #0	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X14, X13, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CSEL X15, X14, X13, #13	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SCVTF D0, X15	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	1	scal (25.0%)
STR X15, [X5, #744]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0.50	0.50	1	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D0, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
RET	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A
HINT #0																			N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	2	0	3.78	0	6.65	0	12.4	0	17.85	0	22.9	0	28.65	0	32.7	0	39.95	0	45.43	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	0.43000000715256	0.12424178421497
1x2	1	2	2	2	0.41499999165535	0.11494201421738
1x4	1	3.78	3.78	4	0.40999999642372	0.1110771894455
1x8	1	6.65	6.65	8	0.41999998688698	0.10459441691637
1x16	1	12.4	12.4	16	0.42499998211861	0.065988637506962
1x24	1	17.85	17.85	24	0.42499995231628	0.048236902803183
1x32	1	22.9	22.9	32	0.43000000715256	0.040176525712013
1x40	1	28.65	28.65	40	0.43000000715256	0.033978641033173
1x48	1	32.7	32.7	48	0.43999999761581	0.029672771692276
1x56	1	39.95	39.95	56	0.42500001192093	0.024689551442862
1x64	1	45.43	45.43	64	0.4200000166893	0.021308969706297

Name	Coverage (%)	Time (s)
○hypre_Rand	0.12	0.43

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Conversion instructions

Details

Workaround

Matching between your function (in the source code) and the binary function

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency