OV - exec - Loop 3202

0x51708c LDR	X16, [X26, X13,LSL #3]

0x517090 LDR	D0, [X28, X13,LSL #3]

0x517094 UBFM	X5, X16, #61, #60

0x517098 ADD	X1, X5, #8

0x51709c LDR	X0, [X25, X5]

0x5170a0 ADD	X9, X25, X1

0x5170a4 LDR	X7, [X25, X1]

0x5170a8 CMP	X0, X7

0x5170ac B.GE	5170ec

  (3203) 0x5170b0 LDR	X3, [X20, X0,LSL #3]

  (3203) 0x5170b4 LDR	D1, [X21, X0,LSL #3]

  (3203) 0x5170b8 UBFM	X14, X3, #61, #60

  (3203) 0x5170bc LDR	X2, [X19, X14]

  (3203) 0x5170c0 FMUL	D29, D0, D1

  (3203) 0x5170c4 UBFM	X11, X2, #61, #60

  (3203) 0x5170c8 CMP	X12, X2

  (3203) 0x5170cc B.GT	517124

  (3203) 0x5170d0 LDR	D30, [X17, X11]

  (3203) 0x5170d4 ADD	X0, X0, #1

  (3203) 0x5170d8 FADD	D20, D30, D29

  (3203) 0x5170dc STR	D20, [X17, X11]

  (3203) 0x5170e0 CMP	X7, X0

  (3203) 0x5170e4 B.GT	5170b0

0x5170e8 LDR	X10, [X4, X27,LSL #3]

0x5170ec ADD	X13, X13, #1

0x5170f0 CMP	X13, X10

0x5170f4 B.LT	51708c

  (3203) 0x517124 STR	X8, [X19, X14]

  (3203) 0x517128 ADD	X0, X0, #1

  (3203) 0x51712c STR	X3, [X15, X8,LSL #3]

  (3203) 0x517130 ADD	X8, X8, #1

  (3203) 0x517134 LDR	X22, [X19, X14]

  (3203) 0x517138 LDR	X7, [X9]

  (3203) 0x51713c STR	D29, [X17, X22,LSL #3]

  (3203) 0x517140 CMP	X0, X7

  (3203) 0x517144 B.LT	5170b0

0x517148 B	5170e8

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c: 282 - 298

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

282:       for (ia = A_i[ic]; ia < A_i[ic+1]; ia++)

283:       {

284: 	 ja = A_j[ia];

285: 	 a_entry = A_data[ia];

286: 	 for (ib = B_i[ja]; ib < B_i[ja+1]; ib++)

287: 	 {

288: 	    jb = B_j[ib];

289: 	    b_entry = B_data[ib];

290: 	    if (B_marker[jb] < row_start)

291: 	    {

292: 		B_marker[jb] = counter;

293: 		C_j[B_marker[jb]] = jb;

294: 		C_data[B_marker[jb]] = a_entry*b_entry;

295: 		counter++;

296: 	    }

297: 	    else

298: 		C_data[B_marker[jb]] += a_entry*b_entry;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►51.22+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►48.78+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►75.45+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►24.55+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►89.32+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►10.68+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►89.86+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►10.14+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.77+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.23+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.85+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.15+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.68+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.32+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.14+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.86+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply	csr_matop.c:185	exec
○	hypre_ParTMatmul	par_csr_matop.c:3287	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSetup	par_amg_setup.c:1227	exec
○	hypre_PCGSetup	pcg.c:234	exec
○	main	amg.c:398	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►99.21+	omp_fulfill_event	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	thread_start	libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►99.22+	omp_fulfill_event	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	thread_start	libc.so.6

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.64
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:282-282,csr_matop.c:285-286
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.64
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.64
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.41
Front-end cycles	1.63
P0 cycles	1.17
P1 cycles	1.17
P2 cycles	1.50
P3 cycles	1.50
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.56
P11 cycles	1.56
P12 cycles	1.56
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	13.00
Nb uops	13.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.13
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue, P2, P3, P4, P5,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:282-282,csr_matop.c:285-286
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.38
Front-end cycles	1.50
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.50
P3 cycles	1.50
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.33
P11 cycles	1.33
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	12.00
Nb uops	12.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.67
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.03
Bottlenecks	P10, P11, P12,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:282-282,csr_matop.c:285-286
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.67
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.67
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.42
Front-end cycles	1.63
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.50
P3 cycles	1.50
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.67
P11 cycles	1.67
P12 cycles	1.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	13.00
Nb uops	13.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.75
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source	csr_matop.c:282-282,csr_matop.c:285-286
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.75
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.75
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.44
Front-end cycles	1.75
P0 cycles	1.50
P1 cycles	1.50
P2 cycles	1.50
P3 cycles	1.50
P4 cycles	1.50
P5 cycles	1.50
P6 cycles	0.00
P7 cycles	0.00
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.67
P11 cycles	1.67
P12 cycles	1.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	14.00
Nb uops	14.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	4.00
Stride indirect	2.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:282-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282-298.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282,285-286.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
This loop has 3 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.64 to 0.41 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	13
nb uops	13
loop length	52
used w registers	0
used x registers	12.33
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	1.63 cycles
front end	1.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.17	1.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.56	1.56	1.56	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.17	1.17	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.56	1.56	1.56	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.63
Dispatch	1.61
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.64

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.64 cycles.

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:282-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282-298.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282,285-286.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
This loop has 3 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 1.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 0.37 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	12
nb uops	12
loop length	48
used w registers	0
used x registers	11
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.50 cycles
front end	1.50 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.33	1.33	1.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.33	1.33	1.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.50
Dispatch	1.50
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 1.33 cycles (1.13x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 51708c

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X16, [X26, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X28, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
UBFM X5, X16, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X1, X5, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X0, [X25, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X25, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X7, [X25, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X0, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GE 5170ec <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x6cc>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADD X13, X13, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X13, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 51708c <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x66c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:282-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282-298.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282,285-286.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
This loop has 3 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.67 to 1.00 cycles (1.67x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.67 to 0.42 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	13
nb uops	13
loop length	52
used w registers	0
used x registers	13
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.63 cycles
front end	1.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.67	1.67	1.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.67	1.67	1.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.63
Dispatch	1.67
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.67

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.67 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 51708c

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X16, [X26, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X28, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
UBFM X5, X16, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X1, X5, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X0, [X25, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X25, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X7, [X25, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X0, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GE 5170ec <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x6cc>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X10, [X4, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X13, X13, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X13, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 51708c <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x66c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	csr_matop.c:282-298
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282-298.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matop.c:282,285-286.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
This loop has 3 execution paths.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.75 to 1.00 cycles (1.75x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.75 to 0.44 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 4 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 2 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	14
nb uops	14
loop length	56
used w registers	0
used x registers	13
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.75 cycles
front end	1.75 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.67	1.67	1.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.67	1.67	1.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.75
Dispatch	1.67
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.75

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.75 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.75 to 1.67 cycles (1.05x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 51708c

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X16, [X26, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X28, X13,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
UBFM X5, X16, #61, #60	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X1, X5, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X0, [X25, X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X25, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR X7, [X25, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X0, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GE 5170ec <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x6cc>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X10, [X4, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
ADD X13, X13, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X13, X10	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.LT 51708c <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x66c>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
B 5170e8 <hypre_CSRMatrixMultiply._omp_fn.0+0x6c8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1.8	0	3.3	0	4.83	0	8.64	0	12.44	0	15.78	0	19.23	0	20.9	0	23.97	0	26.31	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	0.76500004529953	0.22103479504585
1x2	2	1.8	1.8	2	0.41999998688698	0.22711434960365
1x4	4	3.3	3.3	4	0.24500000476837	0.22621816396713
1x8	8	4.83	4.83	8	0.18500000238419	0.25650534033775
1x16	16	8.64	8.64	16	0.10999999940395	0.16846509277821
1x24	24	12.44	12.44	24	0.064999997615814	0.12314596027136
1x32	32	15.78	15.78	32	0.054999999701977	0.10371149331331
1x40	39	19.23	19.23	40	0.055000003427267	0.090082906186581
1x48	48	20.9	20.9	48	0.050000000745058	0.082611680030823
1x56	54	23.97	23.97	56	0.045000001788139	0.07319725304842
1x64	63	26.31	26.31	64	0.045000001788139	0.065448977053165

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency