OV - exec - Loop 3326

0x51de04 LDR	X13, [X22, X20,LSL #3]

0x51de08 LDR	X14, [X11, X20,LSL #3]

0x51de0c LDR	D24, [X26, X20,LSL #3]

0x51de10 CMP	X13, X14

0x51de14 B.GE	51de54

0x51de18 ADD	X15, X25, X13,LSL #3

0x51de1c MOVZ	X18, #0

0x51de20 SUB	X16, X14, X13

0x51de24 ADD	X17, X24, X13,LSL #3

0x51de28 WHILELO	P1.D, XZR, X16

0x51de2c DUP	Z28.D, #0

  (3327) 0x51de30 LD1D	{Z25.D}, P1/Z, [X17, X18,LSL #3]

  (3327) 0x51de34 LD1D	{Z29.D}, P1/Z, [X15, X18,LSL #3]

  (3327) 0x51de38 LD1D	{Z18.D}, P1/Z, [X19, Z25.D,LSL #3]

  (3327) 0x51de3c ADD	X18, X18, X12

  (3327) 0x51de40 FMLA	Z28.D, P1/M, Z18.D, Z29.D

  (3327) 0x51de44 WHILELO	P1.D, X18, X16

  (3327) 0x51de48 B.NE	51de30

0x51de4c FADDV	D19, P0, Z28.D

0x51de50 FADD	D24, D24, D19

0x51de54 STR	D24, [X23, X20,LSL #3]

0x51de58 ADD	X20, X20, #1

0x51de5c CMP	X21, X20

0x51de60 B.NE	51de04

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c: 334 - 341

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

334:             for (i = iBegin; i < iEnd; i++)

335:             {

336:                tempx = b_data[i];

337:                for (jj = A_i[i]; jj < A_i[i+1]; jj++)

338:                {

339:                   tempx += A_data[jj] * x_data[A_j[jj]];

340:                }

341:                y_data[i] = tempx;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.54+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►4.46+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:424	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►53.82+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec
►43.64+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.55+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:424	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►73.95+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►25.63+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►90.97+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►9.03+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►94.32+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►5.30+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.00+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.67+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.77+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.23+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.28+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.38+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.10+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.27+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Module
►98.94+	omp_fulfill_event	libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread	libc.so.6
○	thread_start	libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.90+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.10+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlac[...]	csr_matvec.c:243	exec
○	hypre_ParCSRMatrixMatvecOutOfP[...]	par_csr_matvec.c:216	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGCycle	par_cycle.c:461	exec
○	hypre_BoomerAMGSolve	par_amg_solve.c:235	exec
○	hypre_PCGSolve	pcg.c:545	exec
○	main	amg.c:419	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	amg.c:253	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.45
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.03
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.07
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source	csr_matvec.c:334-337,csr_matvec.c:341-341
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.81
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.25
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.77
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.88
Front-end cycles	1.63
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	1.38
P3 cycles	1.38
P4 cycles	1.38
P5 cycles	1.38
P6 cycles	1.00
P7 cycles	1.00
P8 cycles	0.63
P9 cycles	0.63
P10 cycles	1.50
P11 cycles	1.17
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	13.00
Nb uops	13.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	1.38
Nb FLOP add-sub	2.50
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	4.17
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	20.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	27.21
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	40.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	21.35

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.42
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.05
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.55
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks	micro-operation queue,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source	csr_matvec.c:334-337,csr_matvec.c:341-341
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.13
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	2.03
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.38
Front-end cycles	2.13
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	2.00
P3 cycles	2.00
P4 cycles	2.00
P5 cycles	2.00
P6 cycles	1.50
P7 cycles	1.50
P8 cycles	1.25
P9 cycles	1.25
P10 cycles	1.50
P11 cycles	1.17
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	17.00
Nb uops	17.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.35
Nb FLOP add-sub	5.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	8.33
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	20.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	29.43
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	40.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	17.71

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.50
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.13
Bottlenecks	P10,
Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source	csr_matvec.c:334-337,csr_matvec.c:341-341
Source loop unroll info	NA
Source loop unroll confidence level	NA
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	1.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.50
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.38
Front-end cycles	1.13
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.75
P3 cycles	0.75
P4 cycles	0.75
P5 cycles	0.75
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.00
P9 cycles	0.00
P10 cycles	1.50
P11 cycles	1.17
P12 cycles	1.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	9.00
Nb uops	9.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	NA
Stride 1	NA
Stride n	NA
Stride unknown	NA
Stride indirect	NA
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:334-341
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-341.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-337,341.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 27% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.81 to 0.87 cycles (2.07x speedup).

Details

4% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
20% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 2.5 FP arithmetical operations:

2.50: addition or subtraction

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	13
nb uops	13
loop length	52
used w registers	0
used x registers	11.50
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1.50
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0.50
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	1.63 cycles
front end	1.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	1.38	1.38	1.38	1.38	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	1.38	1.38	1.38	1.38	1.00	1.00	0.63	0.63	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.63
Dispatch	1.75
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.81

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	50%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	50%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	4%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	20%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	23%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

FP

all	62%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	62%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	27%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	40%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	21%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.81 cycles.

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:334-341
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-341.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-337,341.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.13 to 1.50 cycles (1.42x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 29% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.13 to 1.37 cycles (1.55x speedup).

Details

8% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

0% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
20% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU instructions that are not load, store, addition, subtraction nor multiply instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 5 FP arithmetical operations:

5: addition or subtraction

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	17
nb uops	17
loop length	68
used w registers	0
used x registers	15
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	2
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	1
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.13 cycles
front end	2.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	1.50	1.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	1.50	1.50	1.25	1.25	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.13
Dispatch	2.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	2.13

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

FP

all	50%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	50%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	8%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	20%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	22%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

FP

all	62%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	62%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	29%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	40%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	17%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.13 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Performance is limited by instruction throughput (loading/decoding program instructions to execution core) (front-end is a bottleneck). By removing all these bottlenecks, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.13 to 2.00 cycles (1.06x speedup).

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 51de04

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X13, [X22, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR X14, [X11, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D24, [X26, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X13, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GE 51de54 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6+0x5e4>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADD X15, X25, X13,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
MOVZ X18, #0	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
SUB X16, X14, X13	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
ADD X17, X24, X13,LSL #3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (25.0%)
WHILELO P1.D, XZR, X16	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	2	N/A
DUP Z28.D, #0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	scal (3.1%)
FADDV D19, P0, Z28.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.75	0.75	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	9	2	vect (100.0%)
FADD D24, D24, D19	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D24, [X23, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X20, X20, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X21, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 51de04 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6+0x594>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6
Source file and lines	csr_matvec.c:334-341
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-341.

Analyzed code is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/build/AMG/AMG/seq_mv/csr_matvec.c:334-337,341.

Warnings:
Non-innermost loop: analyzing only self part (ignoring child loops).
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = (x<0 ? 0 : x) (or MAX(0,x) after defining the corresponding macro)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 1.00 cycles (1.50x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 1.50 to 0.37 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop does not contain any FP arithmetical operations. The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	9
nb uops	9
loop length	36
used w registers	0
used x registers	8
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	1
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	1.13 cycles
front end	1.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	1.50	1.17	1.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	1.13
Dispatch	1.50
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	1.50

Vectorization ratios

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 1.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 51de04

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR X13, [X22, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR X14, [X11, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D24, [X26, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
CMP X13, X14	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
B.GE 51de54 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6+0x5e4>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
STR D24, [X23, X20,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X20, X20, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X21, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 51de04 <hypre_CSRMatrixMatvecOutOfPlace._omp_fn.6+0x594>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -n 400 400 400MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-188-3659/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_run_1781892409OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1.88	0	4.07	0	6.31	0	12.49	0	15.82	0	19.87	0	26.22	0	28.58	0	28.25	0	32.97	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	1.3449999094009	0.38861671090126
1x2	2	1.88	1.88	2	0.7749999165535	0.38083198666573
1x4	4	4.07	4.07	4	0.34499999880791	0.32239475846291
1x8	8	6.31	6.31	8	0.22000001370907	0.3449125289917
1x16	16	12.49	12.49	16	0.12999999523163	0.20495292544365
1x24	24	15.82	15.82	24	0.10000000149012	0.1702478826046
1x32	32	19.87	19.87	32	0.075000002980232	0.14482235908508
1x40	40	26.22	26.22	40	0.059999998658895	0.11615953594446
1x48	48	28.58	28.58	48	0.059999998658895	0.10621503740549
1x56	56	28.25	28.25	56	0.064999997615814	0.10921494662762
1x64	63	32.97	32.97	64	0.054999999701977	0.091831512749195

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency