OV - exec - Loop 232

	Loop Id: 232	Module: exec	Source: context.h:69-69 [...]	Coverage: 0.75%

0x4354a4 SDIV	W7, W5, W20

0x4354a8 ADD	W25, W7, W13

0x4354ac MSUB	W26, W7, W20, W5

0x4354b0 ADD	W5, W5, #1

0x4354b4 ADD	W27, W25, #1

0x4354b8 SBFM	X3, X25, #0, #31

0x4354bc SBFM	X2, X27, #0, #31

0x4354c0 ADD	W24, W26, W12

0x4354c4 MUL	X23, X10, X3

0x4354c8 MUL	X7, X10, X2

0x4354cc ADD	W4, W24, #1

0x4354d0 SBFM	X1, X24, #0, #31

0x4354d4 SBFM	X4, X4, #0, #31

0x4354d8 MUL	X6, X11, X3

0x4354dc ADD	X27, X23, X4

0x4354e0 ADD	X23, X1, X23

0x4354e4 MUL	X2, X11, X2

0x4354e8 ADD	X25, X4, X7

0x4354ec ADD	X7, X1, X7

0x4354f0 MADD	X26, X15, X3, X1

0x4354f4 LDR	D28, [X8, X27,LSL #3]    [1]

0x4354f8 ADD	X27, X6, X4

0x4354fc ADD	X6, X1, X6

0x435500 ADD	X4, X4, X2

0x435504 ADD	X2, X1, X2

0x435508 MADD	X24, X22, X3, X1

0x43550c LDR	D30, [X8, X23,LSL #3]    [1]

0x435510 MADD	X23, X30, X3, X1

0x435514 MADD	X3, X17, X3, X1

0x435518 LDR	D29, [X8, X7,LSL #3]    [1]

0x43551c LDR	D31, [X8, X25,LSL #3]    [1]

0x435520 FMUL	D27, D28, D28

0x435524 LDR	D0, [X9, X27,LSL #3]    [2]

0x435528 FMUL	D24, D30, D30

0x43552c LDR	D1, [X9, X6,LSL #3]    [2]

0x435530 FMUL	D25, D29, D29

0x435534 LDR	D2, [X9, X2,LSL #3]    [2]

0x435538 FMUL	D26, D31, D31

0x43553c LDR	D3, [X9, X4,LSL #3]    [2]

0x435540 FMADD	D4, D0, D0, D27

0x435544 FMADD	D5, D1, D1, D24

0x435548 LDR	D6, [X14, X26,LSL #3]    [4]

0x43554c FMADD	D7, D2, D2, D25

0x435550 LDR	D16, [X21, X24,LSL #3]    [3]

0x435554 FMADD	D17, D3, D3, D26

0x435558 LDR	D18, [X18, X23,LSL #3]    [6]

0x43555c LDR	D28, [X16, X3,LSL #3]    [5]

0x435560 FADD	D22, D22, D6

0x435564 FMUL	D29, D6, D16

0x435568 FADD	D30, D5, D4

0x43556c FMADD	D15, D6, D28, D15

0x435570 FMADD	D23, D29, D18, D23

0x435574 FADD	D31, D17, D7

0x435578 FMUL	D27, D29, D19

0x43557c FADD	D20, D20, D29

0x435580 FADD	D0, D31, D30

0x435584 FMADD	D21, D27, D0, D21

0x435588 CMP	W0, W5

0x43558c B.NE	4354a4

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h: 69 - 69

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

69:   T &operator()(size_t i, size_t j) const { return data[i + j * sizeX]; }

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/field_summary.cpp: 77 - 91

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

77:       const int j = xmin + 1 + idx % (xmax - xmin + 1);

78:       const int k = ymin + 1 + idx / (xmax - xmin + 1);

79:       double vsqrd = 0.0;

80:       for (int kv = k; kv <= k + 1; ++kv) {

81:         for (int jv = j; jv <= j + 1; ++jv) {

82:           vsqrd += 0.25 * (field.xvel0(jv, kv) * field.xvel0(jv, kv) + field.yvel0(jv, kv) * field.yvel0(jv, kv));

83:         }

84:       }

85:       double cell_vol = field.volume(j, k);

86:       double cell_mass = cell_vol * field.density0(j, k);

87:       vol += cell_vol;

88:       mass += cell_mass;

89:       ie += cell_mass * field.energy0(j, k);

90:       ke += cell_mass * 0.5 * vsqrd;

91:       press += cell_vol * field.pressure(j, k);

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►80.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►10.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:112	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►10.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	start(parallel_&, global_confi[...]	basic_string.h:1076	exec
○	initialise(parallel_&, std::ve[...]	clover_leaf.cpp:192	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:204	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►50.02+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►39.99+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►4.99+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:112	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►4.99+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	start(parallel_&, global_confi[...]	basic_string.h:1076	exec
○	initialise(parallel_&, std::ve[...]	clover_leaf.cpp:192	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:204	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►75.06+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►19.94+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►2.53+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:112	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►2.48+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	start(parallel_&, global_confi[...]	basic_string.h:1076	exec
○	initialise(parallel_&, std::ve[...]	clover_leaf.cpp:192	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:204	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►87.58+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►9.90+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►1.26+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:112	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec
►1.26+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	start(parallel_&, global_confi[...]	basic_string.h:1076	exec
○	initialise(parallel_&, std::ve[...]	clover_leaf.cpp:192	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:204	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.76+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►4.98+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.78+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.34+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.77+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.60+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.47+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.02+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.94+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.67+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.20+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.44+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.43+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.26+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary(global_variables[...]	field_summary.cpp:75	exec
○	hydro(global_variables&, paral[...]	hydro.cpp:96	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.cpp:209	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.cpp:51	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.84 - 3.13
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	3.13
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.05 - 1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05 - 1.69
Bottlenecks	P6, P8,
Function	field_summary(global_variables&, parallel_&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source	context.h:69-69,field_summary.cpp:77-91
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.38 - 12.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	4.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	7.00 - 12.50
Front-end cycles	7.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	7.00
P3 cycles	7.00
P4 cycles	7.00
P5 cycles	7.00
P6 cycles	4.50
P7 cycles	4.50
P8 cycles	4.50
P9 cycles	4.50
P10 cycles	4.00
P11 cycles	4.00
P12 cycles	4.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	5.00 - 12.50
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	59.00
Nb uops	59.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.39 - 2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	5.00
Nb FLOP mul	6.00
Nb FLOP fma	7.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	6.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	27.42
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	100.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.84 - 3.13
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	3.13
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.05 - 1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05 - 1.69
Bottlenecks	P6, P8,
Function	field_summary(global_variables&, parallel_&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source	context.h:69-69,field_summary.cpp:77-91
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.38 - 12.50
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	4.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	7.00 - 12.50
Front-end cycles	7.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	7.00
P3 cycles	7.00
P4 cycles	7.00
P5 cycles	7.00
P6 cycles	4.50
P7 cycles	4.50
P8 cycles	4.50
P9 cycles	4.50
P10 cycles	4.00
P11 cycles	4.00
P12 cycles	4.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	5.00 - 12.50
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	59.00
Nb uops	59.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.39 - 2.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	5.00
Nb FLOP mul	6.00
Nb FLOP fma	7.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	6.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	27.42
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	100.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	field_summary(global_variables&, parallel_&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines	context.h:69-69
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/field_summary.cpp:77-91

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 4.00 cycles (3.12x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 27% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 7.25 cycles (1.72x speedup).

FMA

Detected 7 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 6 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 25 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction (7 inside FMA instructions)
13: multiply (7 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	59
loop length	236
used w registers	11
used x registers	23
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	25
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	0.83

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.38 cycles
front end	7.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	5.00-12.50
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.38
Dispatch	7.00
DIV/SQRT	5.00-12.50
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	7.38-12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	30%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	27%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 12.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4354a4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SDIV W7, W5, W20	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5-12	5-12.50	N/A
ADD W25, W7, W13	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MSUB W26, W7, W20, W5	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD W5, W5, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD W27, W25, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X3, X25, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X2, X27, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD W24, W26, W12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X23, X10, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
MUL X7, X10, X2	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD W4, W24, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X1, X24, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (100.0%)
SBFM X4, X4, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X6, X11, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD X27, X23, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X23, X1, X23	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X2, X11, X2	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD X25, X4, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X7, X1, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MADD X26, X15, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D28, [X8, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X27, X6, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X6, X1, X6	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X4, X4, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X2, X1, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MADD X24, X22, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D30, [X8, X23,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
MADD X23, X30, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
MADD X3, X17, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D29, [X8, X7,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D31, [X8, X25,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D28, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X9, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D24, D30, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D1, [X9, X6,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D25, D29, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D2, [X9, X2,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D26, D31, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X9, X4,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D4, D0, D0, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D5, D1, D1, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X14, X26,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D2, D2, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X21, X24,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D17, D3, D3, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D18, [X18, X23,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X16, X3,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D22, D22, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D29, D6, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D30, D5, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D6, D28, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D23, D29, D18, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D31, D17, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D29, D19	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D20, D20, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D31, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D21, D27, D0, D21	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W0, W5	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 4354a4 <_Z13field_summaryR16global_variablesR9parallel_._omp_fn.0+0xc4>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	field_summary(global_variables&, parallel_&) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines	context.h:69-69
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/context.h:69
/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/build/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/src/omp/field_summary.cpp:77-91

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 4.00 cycles (3.12x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 27% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers).

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 12.50 to 7.25 cycles (1.72x speedup).

FMA

Detected 7 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 6 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 25 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction (7 inside FMA instructions)
13: multiply (7 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	59
loop length	236
used w registers	11
used x registers	23
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	25
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	0.83

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.38 cycles
front end	7.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	7.00	7.00	7.00	7.00	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	5.00-12.50
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.38
Dispatch	7.00
DIV/SQRT	5.00-12.50
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	7.38-12.50

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	30%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	27%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	100%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 12.50 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4354a4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
SDIV W7, W5, W20	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5-12	5-12.50	N/A
ADD W25, W7, W13	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MSUB W26, W7, W20, W5	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
ADD W5, W5, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD W27, W25, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X3, X25, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X2, X27, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD W24, W26, W12	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X23, X10, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
MUL X7, X10, X2	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD W4, W24, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SBFM X1, X24, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	scal (100.0%)
SBFM X4, X4, #0, #31	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X6, X11, X3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD X27, X23, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X23, X1, X23	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MUL X2, X11, X2	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
ADD X25, X4, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X7, X1, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MADD X26, X15, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D28, [X8, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X27, X6, X4	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X6, X1, X6	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X4, X4, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X2, X1, X2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
MADD X24, X22, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D30, [X8, X23,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
MADD X23, X30, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
MADD X3, X17, X3, X1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	N/A
LDR D29, [X8, X7,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D31, [X8, X25,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D28, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X9, X27,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D24, D30, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D1, [X9, X6,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D25, D29, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D2, [X9, X2,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D26, D31, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X9, X4,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D4, D0, D0, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D5, D1, D1, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X14, X26,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D2, D2, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X21, X24,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D17, D3, D3, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D18, [X18, X23,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X16, X3,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D22, D22, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D29, D6, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D30, D5, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D6, D28, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D23, D29, D18, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D31, D17, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D29, D19	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D20, D20, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D31, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D21, D27, D0, D21	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W0, W5	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 4354a4 <_Z13field_summaryR16global_variablesR9parallel_._omp_fn.0+0xc4>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-219-7589/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_4/oneview_run_1782227431OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1	0	0.99	0.01	0.98	0.01	0.95	0.02	0.82	0.07	0.68	0.12	0.58	0.15	0.5	0.17	0.43	0.19	0.38	0.21

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	11.100002288818	0.74681615829468
1x2	2	1	1.99	2	5.5599999427795	0.74344205856323
1x4	4	0.99	3.97	4	2.7750000953674	0.72953480482101
1x8	8	0.98	7.87	8	1.3949997425079	0.65017956495285
1x16	16	0.95	15.19	16	0.70000004768372	0.43445125222206
1x24	24	0.82	19.61	24	0.56999999284744	0.360865265131
1x32	32	0.68	21.6	32	0.52000004053116	0.35577067732811
1x40	40	0.58	23.17	40	0.48000001907349	0.34994566440582
1x48	48	0.5	23.97	48	0.46500000357628	0.34410038590431
1x56	56	0.43	24.15	56	0.45000004768372	0.34217557311058
1x64	64	0.38	24.12	64	0.45500001311302	0.34204003214836

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency