OV - exec - Loop 153

	Loop Id: 153	Module: exec	Source: calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129	Coverage: 9.85%

0x422b80 FMUL	D30, D26, D25

0x422b84 LDR	D0, [X5, X1,LSL #3]    [9]

0x422b88 LDR	D29, [X4, X1,LSL #3]    [14]

0x422b8c LDR	D15, [X6, X1,LSL #3]    [10]

0x422b90 FABS	D4, D30

0x422b94 LDR	D1, [X2, X1,LSL #3]    [8]

0x422b98 FADD	D5, D0, D22

0x422b9c FMOV	D22, D0

0x422ba0 LDR	D27, [X11, X1,LSL #3]    [6]

0x422ba4 FADD	D2, D29, D23

0x422ba8 FMOV	D23, D29

0x422bac LDR	D28, [X10, X1,LSL #3]    [4]

0x422bb0 LDR	D25, [X3, X1,LSL #3]    [13]

0x422bb4 FADD	D26, D1, D15

0x422bb8 LDR	D3, [X7, X1,LSL #3]    [1]

0x422bbc FMUL	D0, D5, D27

0x422bc0 FMUL	D31, D2, D28

0x422bc4 LDR	D15, [X9, X1,LSL #3]    [3]

0x422bc8 FMUL	D1, D26, D25

0x422bcc LDR	D28, [X12, X1,LSL #3]    [7]

0x422bd0 FADD	D6, D3, D3

0x422bd4 FABS	D5, D0

0x422bd8 LDR	D27, [X28, X1,LSL #3]    [12]

0x422bdc FMINNM	D2, D16, D27

0x422be0 FMUL	D27, D2, D17

0x422be4 FSUB	D30, D31, S30

0x422be8 FABS	D3, D31

0x422bec FMAXNM	D31, D3, D5

0x422bf0 LDR	D29, [X8, X1,LSL #3]    [2]

0x422bf4 FSUB	D5, D1, S0

0x422bf8 FADD	D0, D28, D28

0x422bfc FMUL	D3, D20, D28

0x422c00 FMUL	D2, D19, D28

0x422c04 FDIV	D15, D6, D15

0x422c08 FMUL	D28, D24, D28

0x422c0c FMAXNM	D6, D31, D28

0x422c10 FABS	D1, D1

0x422c14 FMAXNM	D4, D4, D28

0x422c18 FMAXNM	D1, D4, D1

0x422c1c FADD	D30, D30, D5

0x422c20 FDIV	D5, D3, D6

0x422c24 FDIV	D31, D30, D0

0x422c28 FMADD	D29, D29, D29, D15

0x422c2c FDIV	D0, D2, D1

0x422c30 FSQRT	D3, D29

0x422c34 FMAXNM	D2, D24, D3

0x422c38 FCMPE	D18, D31

0x422c3c FDIV	D27, D27, D2

0x422c40 FMINNM	D15, D5, D27

0x422c44 B.GT	422cf4

0x422c48 ADD	X1, X1, #1

0x422c4c LDR	D28, [X30]    [5]

0x422c50 FMINNM	D4, D0, D28

0x422c54 FMINNM	D6, D4, D15

0x422c58 FMINNM	D21, D21, D6

0x422c5c CMP	W13, W1

0x422c60 B.GE	422b80

0x422cf4 FDIV	D1, D7, D31

0x422cf8 LDR	D30, [X18]    [11]

0x422cfc ADD	X1, X1, #1

0x422d00 FNMUL	D5, D1, D30

0x422d04 FMINNM	D31, D5, D0

0x422d08 FMINNM	D29, D31, D15

0x422d0c FMINNM	D21, D21, D29

0x422d10 CMP	W13, W1

0x422d14 B.GE	422b80

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/calc_dt_kernel.f90: 96 - 129

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

96:         dsx=celldx(j)

97:         dsy=celldy(k)

98:

99:         cc=soundspeed(j,k)*soundspeed(j,k)

100:         cc=cc+2.0_8*viscosity_a(j,k)/density0(j,k)

101:         cc=MAX(SQRT(cc),g_small)

102:

103:         dtct=dtc_safe*MIN(dsx,dsy)/cc

104:

105:         div=0.0

106:

107:         dv1=(xvel0(j  ,k)+xvel0(j  ,k+1))*xarea(j  ,k)

108:         dv2=(xvel0(j+1,k)+xvel0(j+1,k+1))*xarea(j+1,k)

109:

110:         div=div+dv2-dv1

111:

112:         dtut=dtu_safe*2.0_8*volume(j,k)/MAX(ABS(dv1),ABS(dv2),g_small*volume(j,k))

113:

114:         dv1=(yvel0(j,k  )+yvel0(j+1,k  ))*yarea(j,k  )

115:         dv2=(yvel0(j,k+1)+yvel0(j+1,k+1))*yarea(j,k+1)

116:

117:         div=div+dv2-dv1

118:

119:         dtvt=dtv_safe*2.0_8*volume(j,k)/MAX(ABS(dv1),ABS(dv2),g_small*volume(j,k))

120:

121:         div=div/(2.0_8*volume(j,k))

122:

123:         IF(div.LT.-g_small)THEN

124:           dtdivt=dtdiv_safe*(-1.0_8/div)

125:         ELSE

126:           dtdivt=g_big

127:         ENDIF

128:

129:         dt_min_val=MIN(dt_min_val,dtct,dtut,dtvt,dtdivt)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►50.02+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►49.98+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►74.96+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►25.04+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►87.50+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►12.50+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.74+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►6.26+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.69+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►4.31+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.75+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.25+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.40+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.60+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.86+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.14+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.17+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.83+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.41+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.59+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	calc_dt_kernel	calc_dt_kernel.f90:89	exec
○	calc_dt	calc_dt.f90:81	exec
○	timestep	timestep.f90:87	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:54	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.63 - 5.30
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00 - 2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.11 - 2.24
Bottlenecks
Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	11.38 - 22.98
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.72 - 11.49
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	5.69 - 11.49
Front-end cycles	7.25
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	10.25
P7 cycles	10.25
P8 cycles	10.25
P9 cycles	10.25
P10 cycles	4.33
P11 cycles	4.33
P12 cycles	4.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	11.38 - 22.98
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	58.00
Nb uops	58.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.15 - 1.07
Nb FLOP add-sub	8.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	5.50
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	1.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	12.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.42 - 4.90
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00 - 2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.05 - 2.12
Bottlenecks	P6, P8,
Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	10.51 - 21.23
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.31 - 10.61
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	5.25 - 10.61
Front-end cycles	7.13
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	10.00
P7 cycles	10.00
P8 cycles	10.00
P9 cycles	10.00
P10 cycles	4.33
P11 cycles	4.33
P12 cycles	4.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	10.51 - 21.23
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	57.00
Nb uops	57.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.28 - 1.13
Nb FLOP add-sub	8.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	5.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	1.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	12.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	2.83 - 5.71
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	2.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.17 - 2.35
Bottlenecks	P6, P8,
Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	12.26 - 24.72
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	4.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.13 - 12.36
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	6.13 - 12.36
Front-end cycles	7.38
P0 cycles	1.00
P1 cycles	1.00
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.50
P4 cycles	0.50
P5 cycles	0.50
P6 cycles	10.50
P7 cycles	10.50
P8 cycles	10.50
P9 cycles	10.50
P10 cycles	4.33
P11 cycles	4.33
P12 cycles	4.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	12.26 - 24.72
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	59.00
Nb uops	59.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	2.04 - 1.01
Nb FLOP add-sub	8.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	1.00
Nb FLOP div	6.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	1.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	12.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	0.00
Vectorization ratio other	0.00
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio other	25.00

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.
The structure of this loop is probably <if then [else] end>.

The presence of multiple execution paths is typically the main/first bottleneck.
Try to simplify control inside loop: ideally, try to remove all conditional expressions, for example by (if applicable):

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = max(0,x) (Fortran instrinsic procedure)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.98 to 11.49 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: Fortran storage order is column-major: do i do j a(i,j) = b(i,j) (slow, non stride 1) => do i do j a(j,i) = b(i,j) (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): do i a(i)%x = b(i)%x (slow, non stride 1) => do i a%x(i) = b%x(i) (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 22.98 to 8.63 cycles (2.66x speedup).

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 12 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24.5 FP arithmetical operations:

9: addition or subtraction (1 inside FMA instructions)
9: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)
5.50: divide
1: square root

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	58
nb uops	58
loop length	232
used w registers	2
used x registers	14
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	2
used d registers	24.50
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE

micro-operation queue	7.25 cycles
front end	7.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.25	10.25	10.25	10.25	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.25	10.25	10.25	10.25	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	11.38-22.98
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.25
Dispatch	10.25
DIV/SQRT	11.38-22.98
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	11.38-22.98

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 22.98 cycles.

Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Module	exec

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = max(0,x) (Fortran instrinsic procedure)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 21.23 to 4.33 cycles (4.90x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
To reference allocatable arrays, use "allocatable" instead of "pointer" pointers or qualify them with the "contiguous" attribute (Fortran 2008)
For structures, limit to one indirection. For example, use a_b%c instead of a%b%c with a_b set to a%b before this loop

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 21.23 to 10.61 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: Fortran storage order is column-major: do i do j a(i,j) = b(i,j) (slow, non stride 1) => do i do j a(j,i) = b(i,j) (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): do i a(i)%x = b(i)%x (slow, non stride 1) => do i a%x(i) = b%x(i) (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 21.23 to 8.50 cycles (2.50x speedup).

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 12 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24 FP arithmetical operations:

9: addition or subtraction (1 inside FMA instructions)
9: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)
5: divide
1: square root

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	57
nb uops	57
loop length	228
used w registers	2
used x registers	14
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	2
used d registers	24
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.13 cycles
front end	7.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.00	10.00	10.00	10.00	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	10.51-21.23
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.13
Dispatch	10.00
DIV/SQRT	10.51-21.23
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	10.51-21.23

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 21.23 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 422b80

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
FMUL D30, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X5, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X4, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D15, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FABS D4, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D1, [X2, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D5, D0, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D22, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D29, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D23, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D25, [X3, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D26, D1, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D5, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D31, D2, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D15, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D1, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X12, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D6, D3, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D5, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X28, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D2, D16, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D2, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D30, D31, S30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D3, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D31, D3, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D5, D1, S0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D28, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D20, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D2, D19, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D15, D6, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D28, D24, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D6, D31, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D1, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D4, D4, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D1, D4, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D30, D30, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D5, D3, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D31, D30, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D29, D29, D29, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D0, D2, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FSQRT D3, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-16	1.75-3.75	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D2, D24, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FCMPE D18, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D27, D27, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D15, D5, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
B.GT 422cf4 <__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x414>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
ADD X1, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D28, [X30]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D4, D0, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D6, D4, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D21, D21, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W13, W1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 422b80 <__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x2a0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	calc_dt_kernel.f90:96-129
Module	exec

hoisting them (moving them outside the loop)
turning them into conditional moves, MIN or MAX

Ex: if (x<0) x=0 => x = max(0,x) (Fortran instrinsic procedure)

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.72 to 4.33 cycles (5.71x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
To reference allocatable arrays, use "allocatable" instead of "pointer" pointers or qualify them with the "contiguous" attribute (Fortran 2008)
For structures, limit to one indirection. For example, use a_b%c instead of a%b%c with a_b set to a%b before this loop

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.72 to 12.36 cycles (2.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: Fortran storage order is column-major: do i do j a(i,j) = b(i,j) (slow, non stride 1) => do i do j a(j,i) = b(i,j) (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): do i a(i)%x = b(i)%x (slow, non stride 1) => do i a%x(i) = b%x(i) (fast, stride 1)

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

Detected performance impact from expensive FP math instructions/calls. By removing/reexpressing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 24.72 to 8.75 cycles (2.83x speedup).

FMA

Detected 1 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 12 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 25 FP arithmetical operations:

9: addition or subtraction (1 inside FMA instructions)
9: multiply (1 inside FMA instructions)
6: divide
1: square root

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	59
nb uops	59
loop length	236
used w registers	2
used x registers	14
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	2
used d registers	25
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	7.38 cycles
front end	7.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.50	10.50	10.50	10.50	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	10.50	10.50	10.50	10.50	4.33	4.33	4.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	12.26-24.72
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	7.38
Dispatch	10.50
DIV/SQRT	12.26-24.72
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	12.26-24.72

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	0%
other	0%

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	25%
other	25%

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 24.72 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 422b80

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
FMUL D30, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D0, [X5, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X4, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D15, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FABS D4, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D1, [X2, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D5, D0, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D22, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D29, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMOV D23, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D25, [X3, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D26, D1, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D5, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D31, D2, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D15, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D1, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X12, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D6, D3, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D5, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X28, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D2, D16, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D27, D2, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D30, D31, S30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D3, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D31, D3, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D5, D1, S0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D28, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D20, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D2, D19, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D15, D6, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D28, D24, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D6, D31, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FABS D1, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D4, D4, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D1, D4, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D30, D30, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D5, D3, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D31, D30, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D29, D29, D29, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D0, D2, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FSQRT D3, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-16	1.75-3.75	scal (25.0%)
FMAXNM D2, D24, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FCMPE D18, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	scal (25.0%)
FDIV D27, D27, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D15, D5, D27	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
B.GT 422cf4 <__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x414>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
FDIV D1, D7, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0	0.50	0	0	0	0	7-15	1.75-3.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D30, [X18]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
FNMUL D5, D1, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D31, D5, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D29, D31, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMINNM D21, D21, D29	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W13, W1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 422b80 <__calc_dt_kernel_module_MOD_calc_dt_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x2a0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1	0.02	0.99	0.06	0.99	0.12	0.98	0.12	0.8	0.92	0.65	1.67	0.55	2.11	0.48	2.35	0.41	2.69	0.36	2.95

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	137.76501464844	9.8496036529541
1x2	2	1	2	2	68.854988098145	9.7615022659302
1x4	4	0.99	3.97	4	34.390007019043	9.5282354354858
1x8	8	0.99	7.89	8	17.209999084473	8.3051357269287
1x16	16	0.98	15.63	16	8.6050004959106	5.4620909690857
1x24	24	0.8	19.29	24	7.340000629425	4.6929078102112
1x32	32	0.65	20.71	32	6.8250002861023	4.7220425605774
1x40	40	0.55	21.99	40	6.4450001716614	4.68594789505
1x48	48	0.48	23.12	48	6.1000018119812	4.5420370101929
1x56	56	0.41	23.06	56	6.0750007629395	4.5742163658142
1x64	64	0.36	22.9	64	6.0899996757507	4.5980725288391

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

Expensive FP math instructions/calls

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency