OV - exec - Loop 162

	Loop Id: 162	Module: exec	Source: field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71	Coverage: 0.34%

0x423e20 LDR	D24, [X6, X1,LSL #3]    [2]

0x423e24 ADD	X15, X1, #1

0x423e28 FMADD	D7, D23, D23, D22

0x423e2c FMADD	D17, D26, D26, D25

0x423e30 LDR	D18, [X4, X1,LSL #3]    [8]

0x423e34 LDR	D29, [X7, X1,LSL #3]    [3]

0x423e38 LDR	D27, [X5, X1,LSL #3]    [1]

0x423e3c FMUL	D23, D24, D24

0x423e40 LDR	D16, [X4, X15,LSL #3]    [8]

0x423e44 FMUL	D30, D18, D18

0x423e48 LDR	D22, [X6, X15,LSL #3]    [2]

0x423e4c FMADD	D1, D29, D29, D23

0x423e50 FADD	D0, D17, D7

0x423e54 LDR	D26, [X5, X15,LSL #3]    [1]

0x423e58 FMADD	D2, D27, D27, D30

0x423e5c LDR	D23, [X7, X15,LSL #3]    [3]

0x423e60 FMUL	D25, D16, D16

0x423e64 FMUL	D22, D22, D22

0x423e68 LDR	D3, [X8, X1,LSL #3]    [4]

0x423e6c LDR	D20, [X11, X1,LSL #3]    [7]

0x423e70 FMADD	D6, D26, D26, D25

0x423e74 LDR	D21, [X8, X15,LSL #3]    [4]

0x423e78 FMADD	D7, D23, D23, D22

0x423e7c LDR	D4, [X11, X15,LSL #3]    [7]

0x423e80 FADD	D11, D11, D3

0x423e84 FADD	D28, D2, D1

0x423e88 FMUL	D18, D3, D20

0x423e8c LDR	D19, [X10, X1,LSL #3]    [6]

0x423e90 LDR	D17, [X9, X1,LSL #3]    [5]

0x423e94 ADD	X1, X1, #2

0x423e98 FMUL	D5, D21, D4

0x423e9c LDR	D24, [X10, X15,LSL #3]    [6]

0x423ea0 FADD	D11, D11, D21

0x423ea4 FADD	D29, D28, D0

0x423ea8 FMUL	D16, D18, D31

0x423eac LDR	D30, [X9, X15,LSL #3]    [5]

0x423eb0 FADD	D12, D12, D18

0x423eb4 FADD	D27, D6, D7

0x423eb8 FMADD	D14, D18, D19, D14

0x423ebc FMADD	D13, D3, D17, D13

0x423ec0 FMUL	D0, D5, D31

0x423ec4 FMADD	D15, D16, D29, D15

0x423ec8 FMADD	D14, D5, D24, D14

0x423ecc FADD	D12, D12, D5

0x423ed0 FADD	D2, D27, D28

0x423ed4 FMADD	D13, D21, D30, D13

0x423ed8 FMADD	D15, D0, D2, D15

0x423edc CMP	W12, W1

0x423ee0 B.GE	423e20

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/field_summary_kernel.f90: 62 - 71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

62:             vsqrd=vsqrd+0.25*(xvel0(jv,kv)**2+yvel0(jv,kv)**2)

63:           ENDDO

64:         ENDDO

65:         cell_vol=volume(j,k)

66:         cell_mass=cell_vol*density0(j,k)

67:         vol=vol+cell_vol

68:         mass=mass+cell_mass

69:         ie=ie+cell_mass*energy0(j,k)

70:         ke=ke+cell_mass*0.5*vsqrd

71:         press=press+cell_vol*pressure(j,k)

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►80.02+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►10.04+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	start	start.f90:145	exec
○	initialise	initialise.f90:141	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:72	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►9.94+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:88	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►49.89+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►40.06+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►5.07+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:88	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►4.97+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	start	start.f90:145	exec
○	initialise	initialise.f90:141	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:72	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►74.66+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►20.25+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►2.55+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:88	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►2.55+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	start	start.f90:145	exec
○	initialise	initialise.f90:141	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:72	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►87.59+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►9.95+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►1.23+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	start	start.f90:145	exec
○	initialise	initialise.f90:141	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:72	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►1.23+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:88	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.64+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►5.09+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.75+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.39+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.86+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.51+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.44+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.07+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.91+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.67+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.19+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.45+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.42+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.27+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	field_summary_kernel	field_summary_kernel.f90:54	exec
○	field_summary	field_summary.f90:81	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:74	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.36
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.36
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.18
Bottlenecks	P6, P7, P8, P9,
Function	__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.81
Front-end cycles	6.13
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.75
P3 cycles	0.75
P4 cycles	0.75
P5 cycles	0.75
P6 cycles	7.25
P7 cycles	7.25
P8 cycles	7.25
P9 cycles	7.25
P10 cycles	5.33
P11 cycles	5.33
P12 cycles	5.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	49.00
Nb uops	49.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	5.66
Nb FLOP add-sub	9.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	12.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	8.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.36
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.36
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.18
Bottlenecks	P6, P7, P8, P9,
Function	__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.25
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	5.33
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	5.33
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.81
Front-end cycles	6.13
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.75
P3 cycles	0.75
P4 cycles	0.75
P5 cycles	0.75
P6 cycles	7.25
P7 cycles	7.25
P8 cycles	7.25
P9 cycles	7.25
P10 cycles	5.33
P11 cycles	5.33
P12 cycles	5.33
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	4
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	49.00
Nb uops	49.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	0.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	5.66
Nb FLOP add-sub	9.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	12.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	8.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	NA
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 5.33 cycles (1.36x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
To reference allocatable arrays, use "allocatable" instead of "pointer" pointers or qualify them with the "contiguous" attribute (Fortran 2008)
For structures, limit to one indirection. For example, use a_b%c instead of a%b%c with a_b set to a%b before this loop

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 1.81 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: Fortran storage order is column-major: do i do j a(i,j) = b(i,j) (slow, non stride 1) => do i do j a(j,i) = b(i,j) (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): do i a(i)%x = b(i)%x (slow, non stride 1) => do i a%x(i) = b%x(i) (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 12 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 8 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 41 FP arithmetical operations:

21: addition or subtraction (12 inside FMA instructions)
20: multiply (12 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	49
nb uops	49
loop length	196
used w registers	2
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	29
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.13

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.13 cycles
front end	6.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	7.25	7.25	7.25	7.25	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	7.25	7.25	7.25	7.25	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.13
Dispatch	7.25
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	7.25

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.25 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 423e20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D24, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
FMADD D7, D23, D23, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D17, D26, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D18, [X4, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X5, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D23, D24, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X4, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D30, D18, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D22, [X6, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D1, D29, D29, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D17, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X5, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D2, D27, D27, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D23, [X7, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D25, D16, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D22, D22, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D20, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D6, D26, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D21, [X8, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D23, D23, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D4, [X11, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D11, D11, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D28, D2, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D18, D3, D20	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D19, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
FMUL D5, D21, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D24, [X10, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D11, D11, D21	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D29, D28, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D16, D18, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D30, [X9, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D12, D12, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D27, D6, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D14, D18, D19, D14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D13, D3, D17, D13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D5, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D16, D29, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D14, D5, D24, D14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D12, D12, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D27, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D13, D21, D30, D13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D0, D2, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W12, W1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 423e20 <__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x260>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	field_summary_kernel.f90:62-71
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 5.33 cycles (1.36x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
To reference allocatable arrays, use "allocatable" instead of "pointer" pointers or qualify them with the "contiguous" attribute (Fortran 2008)
For structures, limit to one indirection. For example, use a_b%c instead of a%b%c with a_b set to a%b before this loop

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.25 to 1.81 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: Fortran storage order is column-major: do i do j a(i,j) = b(i,j) (slow, non stride 1) => do i do j a(j,i) = b(i,j) (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): do i a(i)%x = b(i)%x (slow, non stride 1) => do i a%x(i) = b%x(i) (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 12 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 8 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 41 FP arithmetical operations:

21: addition or subtraction (12 inside FMA instructions)
20: multiply (12 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	49
nb uops	49
loop length	196
used w registers	2
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	29
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.13

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	6.13 cycles
front end	6.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	7.25	7.25	7.25	7.25	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.75	7.25	7.25	7.25	7.25	5.33	5.33	5.33	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	4.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	6.13
Dispatch	7.25
Data deps.	4.00
Overall L1	7.25

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.25 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 423e20

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D24, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X15, X1, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
FMADD D7, D23, D23, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D17, D26, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D18, [X4, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D29, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X5, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D23, D24, D24	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X4, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D30, D18, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D22, [X6, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D1, D29, D29, D23	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D0, D17, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X5, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D2, D27, D27, D30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D23, [X7, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D25, D16, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D22, D22, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D3, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D20, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D6, D26, D26, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D21, [X8, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D23, D23, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D4, [X11, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D11, D11, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D28, D2, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D18, D3, D20	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D19, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #2	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
FMUL D5, D21, D4	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D24, [X10, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D11, D11, D21	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D29, D28, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D16, D18, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D30, [X9, X15,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D12, D12, D18	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D27, D6, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D14, D18, D19, D14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D13, D3, D17, D13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D0, D5, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D16, D29, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D14, D5, D24, D14	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D12, D12, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FADD D2, D27, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D13, D21, D30, D13	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D15, D0, D2, D15	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
CMP W12, W1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.GE 423e20 <__field_summary_kernel_module_MOD_field_summary_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x260>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1	0	0.99	0	0.95	0.01	0.53	0.16	0.36	0.23	0.29	0.25	0.25	0.26	0.22	0.27	0.19	0.28	0.17	0.29

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	4.7300000190735	0.33817461133003
1x2	2	1	1.99	2	2.3700001239777	0.33544197678566
1x4	4	0.99	3.97	4	1.1950000524521	0.32708868384361
1x8	8	0.95	7.63	8	0.61500000953674	0.29465839266777
1x16	16	0.53	8.53	16	0.55000001192093	0.3438027203083
1x24	24	0.36	8.72	24	0.5450000166893	0.35649371147156
1x32	32	0.29	9.36	32	0.50499999523163	0.35876581072807
1x40	40	0.25	10.09	40	0.48499998450279	0.35071662068367
1x48	48	0.22	10.46	48	0.45500001311302	0.34487646818161
1x56	56	0.19	10.57	56	0.4549999833107	0.34257578849792
1x64	64	0.17	10.58	64	0.4549999833107	0.34155216813087

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency