OV - exec - Loop 166

	Loop Id: 166	Module: exec	Source: flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60	Coverage: 2.63%

0x424668 LD1D	{Z6.D}, P6/Z, [X9, X1,LSL #3]    [5]

0x42466c LD1D	{Z5.D}, P6/Z, [X15, X1,LSL #3]    [11]

0x424670 LD1D	{Z4.D}, P6/Z, [X7, X1,LSL #3]    [3]

0x424674 LD1D	{Z2.D}, P6/Z, [X14, X1,LSL #3]    [10]

0x424678 LD1D	{Z30.D}, P6/Z, [X11, X1,LSL #3]    [7]

0x42467c LD1RD	{Z3.D}, P7/Z, [X5]    [1]

0x424680 FADD	Z0.D, Z5.D, Z6.D

0x424684 FADD	Z1.D, Z2.D, Z4.D

0x424688 FMUL	Z16.D, Z3.D, Z31.D

0x42468c FADD	Z7.D, Z1.D, Z0.D

0x424690 FMUL	Z17.D, Z7.D, Z30.D

0x424694 FMUL	Z18.D, Z16.D, Z17.D

0x424698 ST1D	{Z18.D}, P6, [X3, X1,LSL #3]    [13]

0x42469c LD1D	{Z19.D}, P6/Z, [X8, X1,LSL #3]    [4]

0x4246a0 LD1D	{Z29.D}, P6/Z, [X13, X1,LSL #3]    [9]

0x4246a4 LD1D	{Z20.D}, P6/Z, [X6, X1,LSL #3]    [2]

0x4246a8 LD1D	{Z27.D}, P6/Z, [X12, X1,LSL #3]    [8]

0x4246ac LD1D	{Z28.D}, P6/Z, [X10, X1,LSL #3]    [6]

0x4246b0 LD1RD	{Z26.D}, P7/Z, [X5]    [1]

0x4246b4 FADD	Z21.D, Z19.D, Z29.D

0x4246b8 FADD	Z22.D, Z20.D, Z27.D

0x4246bc FMUL	Z24.D, Z26.D, Z31.D

0x4246c0 FADD	Z23.D, Z22.D, Z21.D

0x4246c4 FMUL	Z25.D, Z23.D, Z28.D

0x4246c8 FMUL	Z6.D, Z25.D, Z24.D

0x4246cc ST1D	{Z6.D}, P6, [X2, X1,LSL #3]    [12]

0x4246d0 ADD	X1, X1, X16

0x4246d4 WHILELO	P6.D, X1, X4

0x4246d8 B.NE	424668

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/flux_calc_kernel.f90: 58 - 60

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

58:           *(xvel0(j,k)+xvel0(j,k+1)+xvel1(j,k)+xvel1(j,k+1))

59:         vol_flux_y(j,k)=0.25_8*dt*yarea(j,k)                  &

60:           *(yvel0(j,k)+yvel0(j+1,k)+yvel1(j,k)+yvel1(j+1,k))

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►50.36+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
►49.64+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►74.20+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►25.80+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►87.14+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►12.86+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.61+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►6.39+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.77+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►4.23+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.83+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.17+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.47+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.53+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.90+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.10+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.20+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.80+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.42+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.58+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	flux_calc_kernel	flux_calc_kernel.f90:67	exec
○	flux_calc	flux_calc.f90:41	exec
○	hydro	hydro.f90:62	exec
○	main	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	clover_leaf.f90:41	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.12
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.17
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	7.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	7.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	6.25
Front-end cycles	3.63
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.25
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	0.25
P6 cycles	6.00
P7 cycles	6.00
P8 cycles	6.00
P9 cycles	6.00
P10 cycles	7.00
P11 cycles	7.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	29.00
Nb uops	29.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	6.86
Nb FLOP add-sub	24.00
Nb FLOP mul	24.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	54.86
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	320.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	12.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	92.31
Vectorization ratio load	83.33
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	94.23
Vector-efficiency ratio load	87.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.12
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.17
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source	flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	7.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	7.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	7.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	6.25
Front-end cycles	3.63
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	0.50
P3 cycles	0.25
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	0.25
P6 cycles	6.00
P7 cycles	6.00
P8 cycles	6.00
P9 cycles	6.00
P10 cycles	7.00
P11 cycles	7.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	1
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	29.00
Nb uops	29.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	6.86
Nb FLOP add-sub	24.00
Nb FLOP mul	24.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	54.86
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	320.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	12.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	92.31
Vectorization ratio load	83.33
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	100.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	94.23
Vector-efficiency ratio load	87.50
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/build/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/CloverLeaf_ref/kernels/flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is highly vectorized. 94% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 7.00 to 6.25 cycles (1.12x speedup).

Details

92% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

83% of VPU loads are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 12 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 48 FP arithmetical operations:

24: addition or subtraction
24: multiply

The binary loop is loading 320 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	29
nb uops	29
loop length	116
used w registers	0
used x registers	16
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	24
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.63 cycles
front end	3.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.25	6.00	6.00	1.00	1.00	7.00	7.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.25	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	7.00	7.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.63
Dispatch	7.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	7.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	85%
load	83%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	92%
load	83%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	89%
load	87%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	94%
load	87%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.00 cycles. At this rate:

47% of peak load performance is reached (45.71 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
19% of peak store performance is reached (9.14 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 424668

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LD1D {Z6.D}, P6/Z, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z5.D}, P6/Z, [X15, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z4.D}, P6/Z, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z2.D}, P6/Z, [X14, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z30.D}, P6/Z, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1RD {Z3.D}, P7/Z, [X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FADD Z0.D, Z5.D, Z6.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z1.D, Z2.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z16.D, Z3.D, Z31.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z7.D, Z1.D, Z0.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z17.D, Z7.D, Z30.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z18.D, Z16.D, Z17.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1D {Z18.D}, P6, [X3, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z19.D}, P6/Z, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z29.D}, P6/Z, [X13, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z20.D}, P6/Z, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z27.D}, P6/Z, [X12, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z28.D}, P6/Z, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1RD {Z26.D}, P7/Z, [X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FADD Z21.D, Z19.D, Z29.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z22.D, Z20.D, Z27.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z24.D, Z26.D, Z31.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z23.D, Z22.D, Z21.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z25.D, Z23.D, Z28.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z6.D, Z25.D, Z24.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1D {Z6.D}, P6, [X2, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X1, X1, X16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
WHILELO P6.D, X1, X4	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	2	N/A
B.NE 424668 <__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x1a8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0
Source file and lines	flux_calc_kernel.f90:58-60
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

92% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

83% of VPU loads are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

FMA

Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 12 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 48 FP arithmetical operations:

24: addition or subtraction
24: multiply

The binary loop is loading 320 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.12 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	29
nb uops	29
loop length	116
used w registers	0
used x registers	16
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	24
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	1.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.63 cycles
front end	3.63 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.25	6.00	6.00	1.00	1.00	7.00	7.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.25	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	7.00	7.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	1.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.63
Dispatch	7.00
Data deps.	1.00
Overall L1	7.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	85%
load	83%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	92%
load	83%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	89%
load	87%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	94%
load	87%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 7.00 cycles. At this rate:

47% of peak load performance is reached (45.71 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
19% of peak store performance is reached (9.14 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 424668

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LD1D {Z6.D}, P6/Z, [X9, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z5.D}, P6/Z, [X15, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z4.D}, P6/Z, [X7, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z2.D}, P6/Z, [X14, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z30.D}, P6/Z, [X11, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1RD {Z3.D}, P7/Z, [X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FADD Z0.D, Z5.D, Z6.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z1.D, Z2.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z16.D, Z3.D, Z31.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z7.D, Z1.D, Z0.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z17.D, Z7.D, Z30.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z18.D, Z16.D, Z17.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1D {Z18.D}, P6, [X3, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z19.D}, P6/Z, [X8, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z29.D}, P6/Z, [X13, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z20.D}, P6/Z, [X6, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z27.D}, P6/Z, [X12, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1D {Z28.D}, P6/Z, [X10, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1RD {Z26.D}, P7/Z, [X5]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	scal (25.0%)
FADD Z21.D, Z19.D, Z29.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z22.D, Z20.D, Z27.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z24.D, Z26.D, Z31.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z23.D, Z22.D, Z21.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z25.D, Z23.D, Z28.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z6.D, Z25.D, Z24.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1D {Z6.D}, P6, [X2, X1,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X1, X1, X16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
WHILELO P6.D, X1, X4	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	2	N/A
B.NE 424668 <__flux_calc_kernel_module_MOD_flux_calc_kernel._omp_fn.0+0x1a8>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-231-1255/intel/CloverLeaf1.3-FC/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_5/oneview_run_1782340583OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.98	0.04	0.94	0.16	0.71	0.91	0.35	2.68	0.23	3.36	0.18	3.65	0.15	3.89	0.12	4.1	0.11	4.22	0.09	4.31

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	36.725006103516	2.6256794929504
1x2	2	0.98	1.97	2	18.755002975464	2.6413390636444
1x4	4	0.94	3.77	4	9.9700012207031	2.6805317401886
1x8	8	0.71	5.65	8	6.5750007629395	3.0898332595825
1x16	16	0.35	5.55	16	6.5899996757507	4.1001949310303
1x24	24	0.23	5.52	24	6.6699995994568	4.3679513931274
1x32	32	0.18	5.83	32	6.3200006484985	4.468982219696
1x40	40	0.15	6	40	6.1500005722046	4.5786743164063
1x48	48	0.12	5.98	48	6.1499996185303	4.6797790527344
1x56	56	0.11	5.95	56	6.1900000572205	4.7216544151306
1x64	64	0.09	5.91	64	6.2450003623962	4.7465968132019

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency