OV - exec - Loop 19

	Loop Id: 19	Module: exec	Source: cg.cpp:108-113	Coverage: 43.45%

0x4119c4 LDR	D24, [X8, X1]    [2]

0x4119c8 ADD	X9, X1, #8

0x4119cc ADD	X6, X1, #16

0x4119d0 ADD	X21, X1, #24

0x4119d4 LDR	D25, [X18, X1]    [4]

0x4119d8 FMADD	D26, D30, D24, D25

0x4119dc STR	D26, [X18, X1]    [4]

0x4119e0 LDR	D27, [X7, X1]    [1]

0x4119e4 LDR	D28, [X30, X1]    [3]

0x4119e8 FMSUB	D29, D30, D27, D28

0x4119ec FMADD	D0, D29, D29, D31

0x4119f0 STR	D29, [X30, X1]    [3]

0x4119f4 ADD	X1, X1, #32

0x4119f8 LDR	D1, [X8, X9]    [2]

0x4119fc LDR	D2, [X18, X9]    [4]

0x411a00 FMADD	D3, D30, D1, D2

0x411a04 STR	D3, [X18, X9]    [4]

0x411a08 LDR	D4, [X7, X9]    [1]

0x411a0c LDR	D5, [X30, X9]    [3]

0x411a10 FMSUB	D6, D30, D4, D5

0x411a14 FMADD	D7, D6, D6, D0

0x411a18 STR	D6, [X30, X9]    [3]

0x411a1c LDR	D16, [X8, X6]    [2]

0x411a20 LDR	D17, [X18, X6]    [4]

0x411a24 FMADD	D18, D30, D16, D17

0x411a28 STR	D18, [X18, X6]    [4]

0x411a2c LDR	D19, [X7, X6]    [1]

0x411a30 LDR	D20, [X30, X6]    [3]

0x411a34 FMSUB	D21, D30, D19, D20

0x411a38 FMADD	D22, D21, D21, D7

0x411a3c STR	D21, [X30, X6]    [3]

0x411a40 LDR	D31, [X18, X21]    [4]

0x411a44 LDR	D23, [X8, X21]    [2]

0x411a48 FMADD	D24, D30, D23, D31

0x411a4c STR	D24, [X18, X21]    [4]

0x411a50 LDR	D25, [X7, X21]    [1]

0x411a54 LDR	D26, [X30, X21]    [3]

0x411a58 FMSUB	D27, D30, D25, D26

0x411a5c FMADD	D31, D27, D27, D22

0x411a60 STR	D27, [X30, X21]    [3]

0x411a64 CMP	X0, X1

0x411a68 B.NE	4119c4

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp: 108 - 113

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

108:     for (int kk = halo_depth; kk < x - halo_depth; ++kk) {

109:       const int index = kk + jj * x;

110:

111:       u[index] += alpha * p[index];

112:       r[index] -= alpha * w[index];

113:       rrn_temp += r[index] * r[index];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.42+	omp_fulfill_event		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.58+	GOMP_parallel		libgomp.so.1.0.0
○	run_cg_calc_ur(Chunk*, Setting[...]	cg.cpp:105	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:69	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:51	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:179	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	basic_string.h:809	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.52
Bottlenecks
Function	cg_calc_ur(int, int, int, double, double, double, double const, double, double const*) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source	cg.cpp:108-113
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	8.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	8.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	8.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.00
Front-end cycles	5.25
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.25
P3 cycles	1.25
P4 cycles	1.25
P5 cycles	1.25
P6 cycles	5.00
P7 cycles	5.00
P8 cycles	5.00
P9 cycles	5.00
P10 cycles	8.00
P11 cycles	8.00
P12 cycles	8.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	8
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	42.00
Nb uops	42.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	8.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	12.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	4.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	4.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.52
Bottlenecks
Function	cg_calc_ur(int, int, int, double, double, double, double const, double, double const*) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source	cg.cpp:108-113
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	8.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	8.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	8.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	2.00
Front-end cycles	5.25
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.25
P3 cycles	1.25
P4 cycles	1.25
P5 cycles	1.25
P6 cycles	5.00
P7 cycles	5.00
P8 cycles	5.00
P9 cycles	5.00
P10 cycles	8.00
P11 cycles	8.00
P12 cycles	8.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	8
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	42.00
Nb uops	42.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	8.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	3.00
Nb FLOP add-sub	0.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	12.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	4.00
Stride unknown	0.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	NA
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio load	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	cg_calc_ur(int, int, int, double, double, double, double const, double, double const*) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines	cg.cpp:108-113
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp:108-113.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 2.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 12 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
12: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	42
nb uops	42
loop length	168
used w registers	0
used x registers	9
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	24
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.25 cycles
front end	5.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	8.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.25
Dispatch	8.00
Data deps.	8.00
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 8.00 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4119c4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D24, [X8, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X1, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X6, X1, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X21, X1, #24	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D25, [X18, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D26, D30, D24, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D26, [X18, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X7, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X30, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D29, D30, D27, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D0, D29, D29, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D29, [X30, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #32	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D1, [X8, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D2, [X18, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D3, D30, D1, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X18, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D4, [X7, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D5, [X30, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D6, D30, D4, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D6, D6, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D6, [X30, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X8, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X18, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D18, D30, D16, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D18, [X18, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D19, [X7, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D20, [X30, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D21, D30, D19, D20	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D22, D21, D21, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D21, [X30, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D31, [X18, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D23, [X8, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D24, D30, D23, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D24, [X18, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D25, [X7, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X30, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D27, D30, D25, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D31, D27, D27, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D27, [X30, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
CMP X0, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 4119c4 <_Z10cg_calc_uriiidPdS_PKdS_S1_._omp_fn.0+0x144>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	cg_calc_ur(int, int, int, double, double, double, double const, double, double const*) [clone ._omp_fn.0]
Source file and lines	cg.cpp:108-113
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp:108-113.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. 4 data elements could be processed at once in vector registers. By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 8.00 to 2.00 cycles (4.00x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 12 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations.

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant non-unit stride: 4 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 24 FP arithmetical operations:

12: addition or subtraction (all inside FMA instructions)
12: multiply (all inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	42
nb uops	42
loop length	168
used w registers	0
used x registers	9
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	24
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	5.25 cycles
front end	5.25 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.25	1.25	1.25	1.25	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	8.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	5.25
Dispatch	8.00
Data deps.	8.00
Overall L1	8.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	25%
load	25%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 8.00 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4119c4

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDR D24, [X8, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
ADD X9, X1, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X6, X1, #16	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
ADD X21, X1, #24	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D25, [X18, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D26, D30, D24, D25	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D26, [X18, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D27, [X7, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D28, [X30, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D29, D30, D27, D28	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D0, D29, D29, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D29, [X30, X1]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X1, X1, #32	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D1, [X8, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D2, [X18, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D3, D30, D1, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D3, [X18, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D4, [X7, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D5, [X30, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D6, D30, D4, D5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D7, D6, D6, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D6, [X30, X9]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D16, [X8, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X18, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D18, D30, D16, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D18, [X18, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D19, [X7, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D20, [X30, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D21, D30, D19, D20	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D22, D21, D21, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D21, [X30, X6]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D31, [X18, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D23, [X8, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D24, D30, D23, D31	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D24, [X18, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
LDR D25, [X7, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D26, [X30, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMSUB D27, D30, D25, D26	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D31, D27, D27, D22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D27, [X30, X21]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
CMP X0, X1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	N/A
B.NE 4119c4 <_Z10cg_calc_uriiidPdS_PKdS_S1_._omp_fn.0+0x144>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code