OV - exec - Loop 16

	Loop Id: 16	Module: exec	Source: cg.cpp:86-90	Coverage: 55.35%

0x4112b8 ADD	X25, X20, X3

0x4112bc LDR	D5, [X6, X3]    [2]

0x4112c0 LDR	D6, [X4, X3]    [8]

0x4112c4 LDP	D3, D2, [X25, #1016]    [7]

0x4112c8 ADD	X25, X21, X3

0x4112cc LDUR	D7, [X25, #504]    [6]

0x4112d0 FADD	D16, D5, D6

0x4112d4 LDR	D17, [X5, X3]    [1]

0x4112d8 SUBS	X24, X24, #1

0x4112dc FADD	D4, D2, D3

0x4112e0 FMUL	D3, D3, D7

0x4112e4 LDR	D7, [X25, #8]    [6]

0x4112e8 FADD	D4, D4, D1

0x4112ec FMADD	D2, D2, D7, D3

0x4112f0 FMUL	D3, D6, D17

0x4112f4 LDR	D6, [X25]    [6]

0x4112f8 LDR	D7, [X7, X3]    [3]

0x4112fc FADD	D4, D4, D16

0x411300 FMADD	D3, D5, D7, D3

0x411304 FNMSUB	D2, D4, D6, D2

0x411308 FSUB	D2, D2, S3

0x41130c STR	D2, [X23, X3]    [5]

0x411310 ADD	X3, X3, #8

0x411314 LDR	D3, [X25]    [6]

0x411318 FMADD	D0, D2, D3, D0

0x41131c STR	D0, [SP, #16]    [4]

0x411320 B.NE	4112b8

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp: 86 - 90

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

86:     for (int kk = halo_depth; kk < x - halo_depth; ++kk) {

87:       const int index = kk + jj * x;

88:       const double smvp = tealeaf_SMVP(p);

89:       w[index] = smvp;

90:       pw_temp += w[index] * p[index];

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►50.03+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec
►49.97+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►74.95+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►25.05+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►87.53+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►12.47+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►93.65+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►6.35+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►95.75+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►4.25+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►96.83+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►3.17+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.44+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.56+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.89+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.11+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.20+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.80+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.42+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.58+	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	run_cg_calc_w(Chunk*, Settings[...]	cg.cpp:94	exec
○	cg_main_step_driver(Chunk*, Se[...]	cg_driver.cpp:57	exec
○	cg_driver(Chunk*, Settings&, d[...]	cg_driver.cpp:18	exec
○	solve(Chunk*, Settings&, int, [...]	diffuse.cpp:45	exec
○	diffuse(Chunk*, Settings&)	diffuse.cpp:12	exec
○	main	main.cpp:169	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start		exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	3.67
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P10, P11, P12,
Function	cg_calc_w(int, int, int, double, double const, double, double const, double const*) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source	cg.cpp:86-90
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.67
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	3.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.67
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	3.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	3.25
P7 cycles	3.25
P8 cycles	3.25
P9 cycles	3.25
P10 cycles	3.67
P11 cycles	3.67
P12 cycles	3.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	27.00
Nb uops	27.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	1.00
FLOP/cycle	4.09
Nb FLOP add-sub	5.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	4.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	5.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	4.35
Vectorization ratio load	11.11
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	26.09
Vector-efficiency ratio load	27.78
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	3.67
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.09
Bottlenecks	P10, P11, P12,
Function	cg_calc_w(int, int, int, double, double const, double, double const, double const*) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source	cg.cpp:86-90
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	3.67
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	3.67
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	3.67
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	1.00
Front-end cycles	3.38
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	3.25
P7 cycles	3.25
P8 cycles	3.25
P9 cycles	3.25
P10 cycles	3.67
P11 cycles	3.67
P12 cycles	3.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	27.00
Nb uops	27.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	1.00
FLOP/cycle	4.09
Nb FLOP add-sub	5.00
Nb FLOP mul	2.00
Nb FLOP fma	4.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	0.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	0.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	1.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	5.00
Stride unknown	2.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	4.35
Vectorization ratio load	11.11
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	0.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	0.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	26.09
Vector-efficiency ratio load	27.78
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	cg_calc_w(int, int, int, double, double const, double, double const, double const*) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source file and lines	cg.cpp:86-90
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp:86-90.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 26% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By fully vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 3.67 to 1.00 cycles (3.67x speedup).

Details

4% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

11% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
0% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU multiply instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU fused multiply-add instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 4 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Constant non-unit stride: 5 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 15 FP arithmetical operations:

9: addition or subtraction (4 inside FMA instructions)
6: multiply (4 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	27
nb uops	27
loop length	108
used w registers	0
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	2
used d registers	10
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	1
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.50

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.38 cycles
front end	3.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.38
Dispatch	3.67
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	3.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	8%
load	11%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	4%
load	11%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	27%
load	27%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	26%
load	27%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.67 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4112b8

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X25, X20, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D5, [X6, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDP D3, D2, [X25, #1016]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (50.0%)
ADD X25, X21, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDUR D7, [X25, #504]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D16, D5, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X5, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
SUBS X24, X24, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D2, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D3, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D7, [X25, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D4, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D2, D2, D7, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D6, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X25]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D7, [X7, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D4, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D3, D5, D7, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FNMSUB D2, D4, D6, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D2, D2, S3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D2, [X23, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X3, X3, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D3, [X25]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D0, D2, D3, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D0, [SP, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
B.NE 4112b8 <_Z9cg_calc_wiiiPdPKdS_S1_S1_.omp_outlined+0x144>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	cg_calc_w(int, int, int, double, double const, double, double const, double const*) [clone .omp_outlined]
Source file and lines	cg.cpp:86-90
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/build/TeaLeaf/src/omp/cg.cpp:86-90.

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Details

4% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

11% of VPU loads are used in vector version.
0% of VPU stores are used in vector version.
0% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU multiply instructions are used in vector version.
0% of VPU fused multiply-add instructions are used in vector version.

Since your execution units are vector units, only a fully vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one:
- recompile with ffast-math (included in Ofast) to extend loop vectorization to FP reductions.
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

FMA

Detected 4 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Constant non-unit stride: 5 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 15 FP arithmetical operations:

9: addition or subtraction (4 inside FMA instructions)
6: multiply (4 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop does not load or store any data.

General properties

nb instructions	27
nb uops	27
loop length	108
used w registers	0
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	2
used d registers	10
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	1
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.50

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.38 cycles
front end	3.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.25	3.67	3.67	3.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.38
Dispatch	3.67
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	3.67

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	8%
load	11%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	4%
load	11%
store	0%
mul	0%
add-sub	0%
fma	0%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	27%
load	27%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	26%
load	27%
store	25%
mul	25%
add-sub	25%
fma	25%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 3.67 cycles.

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 4112b8

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X25, X20, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D5, [X6, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDP D3, D2, [X25, #1016]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	vect (50.0%)
ADD X25, X21, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDUR D7, [X25, #504]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D16, D5, D6	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D17, [X5, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
SUBS X24, X24, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D2, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D3, D7	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D7, [X25, #8]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D4, D1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D2, D2, D7, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMUL D3, D6, D17	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	3	0.25	scal (25.0%)
LDR D6, [X25]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
LDR D7, [X7, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FADD D4, D4, D16	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D3, D5, D7, D3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FNMSUB D2, D4, D6, D2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
FSUB D2, D2, S3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D2, [X23, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X3, X3, #8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D3, [X25]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMADD D0, D2, D3, D0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	4	0.25	scal (25.0%)
STR D0, [SP, #16]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
B.NE 4112b8 <_Z9cg_calc_wiiiPdPKdS_S1_S1_.omp_outlined+0x144>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable>MPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-237-4322/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782430622OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	1	0.02	1	0.17	0.99	0.37	0.86	4.42	0.59	13.27	0.49	16.72	0.41	18.77	0.35	21.14	0.3	22.77	0.26	24.26

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	1439.6450195313	55.354640960693
1x2	2	1	2	2	720.49993896484	54.905193328857
1x4	4	1	3.99	4	361.7799987793	53.711879730225
1x8	8	0.99	7.93	8	181.7449798584	44.120021820068
1x16	16	0.86	13.72	16	114.75999450684	31.085668563843
1x24	24	0.59	14.19	24	104.80499267578	32.445869445801
1x32	32	0.49	15.53	32	96.255004882813	32.494155883789
1x40	40	0.41	16.52	40	90.630012512207	31.985105514526
1x48	48	0.35	16.6	48	89.940002441406	32.314666748047
1x56	56	0.3	16.62	56	89.429985046387	32.385189056396
1x64	64	0.26	16.46	64	88.915000915527	32.655082702637

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency