OV - exec - Loop 245

	Loop Id: 245	Module: exec	Source: OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135 [...]	Coverage: NA%

0x421320 LDRSW	X8, [X20, #672]    [4]

0x421324 LDR	X9, [X21, #240]    [5]

0x421328 LDR	W1, [X21, #168]    [5]

0x42132c ORR	X0, XZR, X20

0x421330 LDR	D8, [X9, X8,LSL #3]    [3]

0x421334 BL	452bb0

0x421338 LDR	X8, [X0, #72]    [6]

0x42133c ORR	X0, XZR, X21

0x421340 LDR	X1, [X8, X23]    [2]

0x421344 BL	422ba0

0x421348 FSUB	D0, D8, S0

0x42134c BL	4100f0

0x421350 LDP	X8, X9, [X19]    [7]

0x421354 ADD	X23, X23, #40

0x421358 STR	D0, [X8, X22,LSL #3]    [1]

0x42135c ADD	X22, X22, #1

0x421360 SUB	X8, X9, X8

0x421364 CMP	X22, X8,ASR #3

0x421368 B.CC	421320

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h: 134 - 135

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

134:     for (int k = 0; k < ratios.size(); ++k)

135:       ratios[k] = std::exp(Vat[VP.refPtcl] - computeU(VP.getDistTableAB(myTableID).getDistRow(k).data()));

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/OhmmsVector.h: 223 - 249

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

223:     return X[i];

[...]

249:   inline const_pointer data() const { return X; }

/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-amazon-linux/14/../../../../include/c++/14/bits/stl_vector.h: 993 - 1150

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

993:       { return size_type(this->_M_impl._M_finish - this->_M_impl._M_start); }

[...]

1131: 	return *(this->_M_impl._M_start + __n);

[...]

1150: 	return *(this->_M_impl._M_start + __n);

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.42
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.70
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	6.18
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks	P10,
Function	miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef >::evaluateRatios(qmcplusplus::VirtualParticleSet&, std::vector >&)
Source	OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135,OhmmsVector.h:223-223,OhmmsVector.h:249-249,stl_vector.h:993-993,stl_vector.h:1131-1131,stl_vector.h:1150-1150
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.83
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.67
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.46
Front-end cycles	2.38
P0 cycles	2.00
P1 cycles	2.00
P2 cycles	2.25
P3 cycles	2.25
P4 cycles	2.25
P5 cycles	2.25
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	2.83
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	19.00
Nb uops	19.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.35
Nb FLOP add-sub	1.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	2.12
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	6.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	3.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	2.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	22.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	20.83
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.42
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.70
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	6.18
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.06
Bottlenecks	P10,
Function	miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef >::evaluateRatios(qmcplusplus::VirtualParticleSet&, std::vector >&)
Source	OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135,OhmmsVector.h:223-223,OhmmsVector.h:249-249,stl_vector.h:993-993,stl_vector.h:1131-1131,stl_vector.h:1150-1150
Source loop unroll info	not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	NA
CQA cycles	2.83
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	2.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	1.67
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	0.46
Front-end cycles	2.38
P0 cycles	2.00
P1 cycles	2.00
P2 cycles	2.25
P3 cycles	2.25
P4 cycles	2.25
P5 cycles	2.25
P6 cycles	0.50
P7 cycles	0.50
P8 cycles	0.50
P9 cycles	0.50
P10 cycles	2.83
P11 cycles	2.50
P12 cycles	2.67
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	19.00
Nb uops	19.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	1.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	0.35
Nb FLOP add-sub	1.00
Nb FLOP mul	0.00
Nb FLOP fma	0.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	2.12
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	6.00
Bytes stored	0.00
Stride 0	3.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	2.00
Stride unknown	1.00
Stride indirect	1.00
Vectorization ratio all	0.00
Vectorization ratio load	0.00
Vectorization ratio store	0.00
Vectorization ratio mul	NA
Vectorization ratio add_sub	0.00
Vectorization ratio fma	NA
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	22.50
Vector-efficiency ratio load	20.83
Vector-efficiency ratio store	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	25.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef >::evaluateRatios(qmcplusplus::VirtualParticleSet&, std::vector >&)
Source file and lines	OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135
/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/OhmmsVector.h:223,249
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-amazon-linux/14/../../../../include/c++/14/bits/stl_vector.h:993,1131,1150

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.83 to 2.00 cycles (1.42x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Your loop is not vectorized. Only 22% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions). By vectorizing your loop, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.83 to 0.46 cycles (6.18x speedup).

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

Calling (and then returning from) a function prevents many compiler optimizations (like vectorization), breaks control flow (which reduces pipeline performance) and executes extra instructions to save/restore the registers used inside it, which is very expensive (dozens of cycles). Consider to inline small functions.

miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef
>::computeU(double const*): 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135
qmcplusplus::ParticleSet::getDistTableAB(int) const: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135
unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Constant non-unit stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 1 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 6 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.17 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	19
nb uops	19
loop length	76
used w registers	1
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	1
used d registers	2
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.38 cycles
front end	2.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	2.00	2.00	2.25	2.25	2.25	2.25	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	2.00	2.00	2.25	2.25	2.25	2.25	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.38
Dispatch	2.83
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	2.83

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	21%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	22%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.83 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (2.12 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 421320

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDRSW X8, [X20, #672]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X9, [X21, #240]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR W1, [X21, #168]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (12.5%)
ORR X0, XZR, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D8, [X9, X8,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
BL 452bb0 <_ZNK11qmcplusplus11ParticleSet14getDistTableABEi>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X8, [X0, #72]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
ORR X0, XZR, X21	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X1, [X8, X23]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
BL 422ba0 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17OneBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE8computeUEPKd>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
FSUB D0, D8, S0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
BL 4100f0 <@plt_start@+0xd0>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDP X8, X9, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	1	N/A
ADD X23, X23, #40	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STR D0, [X8, X22,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X22, X22, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SUB X8, X9, X8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X22, X8,ASR #3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
B.CC 421320 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17OneBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE14evaluateRatiosERNS1_18VirtualParticleSetERSt6vectorIdSaIdEE+0x40>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef >::evaluateRatios(qmcplusplus::VirtualParticleSet&, std::vector >&)
Source file and lines	OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135
Module	exec

The loop is defined in:

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:134-135
/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/Numerics/OhmmsPETE/OhmmsVector.h:223,249
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-amazon-linux/14/../../../../include/c++/14/bits/stl_vector.h:993,1131,1150

The related source loop is not unrolled or unrolled with no peel/tail loop.

gain
potential
hint
expert

Code clean check

Detected a slowdown caused by scalar integer instructions (typically used for address computation). By removing them, you can lower the cost of an iteration from 2.83 to 2.00 cycles (1.42x speedup).

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Vectorization

Details

All VPU instructions are used in scalar version (process only one data element in vector registers). Since your execution units are vector units, only a vectorized loop can use their full power.

Workaround

Try another compiler or update/tune your current one
Remove inter-iterations dependences from your loop and make it unit-stride:
- If your arrays have 2 or more dimensions, check whether elements are accessed contiguously and, otherwise, try to permute loops accordingly: C storage order is row-major: for(i) for(j) a[j][i] = b[j][i]; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) for(j) a[i][j] = b[i][j]; (fast, stride 1)
- If your loop streams arrays of structures (AoS), try to use structures of arrays instead (SoA): for(i) a[i].x = b[i].x; (slow, non stride 1) => for(i) a.x[i] = b.x[i]; (fast, stride 1)

No data for this section

CALL instructions

Detected function call instructions.

Details

miniqmcreference::OneBodyJastrowRef
>::computeU(double const*): 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135
qmcplusplus::ParticleSet::getDistTableAB(int) const: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135
unknown: 1 occurrences►
- /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/OneBodyJastrowRef.h:135

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 1 occurrence(s)
Constant non-unit stride: 2 occurrence(s)
Irregular (variable stride) or indirect: 1 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)
Try to remove indirect accesses. If applicable, precompute elements out of the innermost loop.

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 1 FP arithmetical operations:

1: addition or subtraction

The binary loop is loading 6 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.17 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	19
nb uops	19
loop length	76
used w registers	1
used x registers	10
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	1
used d registers	2
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	0
nb stack references	0

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	2.38 cycles
front end	2.38 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	2.00	2.00	2.25	2.25	2.25	2.25	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	0.00	0.00
cycles	2.00	2.00	2.25	2.25	2.25	2.25	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	2.83	2.50	2.67	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	2.38
Dispatch	2.83
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	2.83

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	0%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	0%
load	0%
store	0%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	21%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	NA (no add-sub vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	25%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	22%
load	20%
store	25%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 2.83 cycles. At this rate:

2% of peak load performance is reached (2.12 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 421320

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
LDRSW X8, [X20, #672]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR X9, [X21, #240]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
LDR W1, [X21, #168]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (12.5%)
ORR X0, XZR, X20	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR D8, [X9, X8,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	6	0.33	scal (25.0%)
BL 452bb0 <_ZNK11qmcplusplus11ParticleSet14getDistTableABEi>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDR X8, [X0, #72]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	N/A
ORR X0, XZR, X21	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LDR X1, [X8, X23]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	0.33	scal (25.0%)
BL 422ba0 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17OneBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE8computeUEPKd>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
FSUB D0, D8, S0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	2	0.25	scal (25.0%)
BL 4100f0 <@plt_start@+0xd0>	1	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A
LDP X8, X9, [X19]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.33	4	1	N/A
ADD X23, X23, #40	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
STR D0, [X8, X22,LSL #3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	2	0.50	scal (25.0%)
ADD X22, X22, #1	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
SUB X8, X9, X8	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
CMP X22, X8,ASR #3	1	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	N/A
B.CC 421320 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17OneBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE14evaluateRatiosERNS1_18VirtualParticleSetERSt6vectorIdSaIdEE+0x40>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
		1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1
1x2	1	1	1	2	0.0099999997764826	0.011293084360659
1x4	1	1	1	4	0.0049999998882413	0.0027647295501083
1x8	5	1	1	8	0.015000000596046	0.010281603783369
1x16	6	1	1	16	0.010000000707805	0.005873890593648
1x24	15	1	1	24	0.025000000372529	0.011411293409765
1x32	23	1	1	32	0.029999999329448	0.013238672167063
1x40	25	1	1	40	0.035000000149012	0.011155243963003
1x48	35	1	1	48	0.040000002831221	0.012590532191098
1x56	42	1	1	56	0.035000003874302	0.011860399506986
1x64	48	1	1	64	0.045000001788139	0.013363465666771

Report Configuration

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Code clean check

Workaround

Vectorization

Details

Workaround

CALL instructions

Details

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency