OV - exec - Loop 314

	Loop Id: 314	Module: exec	Source: TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347	Coverage: 0.13%

0x424fa0 ADD	X19, X9, X3

0x424fa4 LD1B	{Z4.B}, P0/Z, [X9, X3]    [2]

0x424fa8 LD1B	{Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X0, X3]    [6]

0x424fac SUBS	X20, X20, X11

0x424fb0 FMUL	Z4.D, Z6.D, Z4.D

0x424fb4 LDR	Z5, [X19, #1, MUL VL]    [4]

0x424fb8 LD1B	{Z7.B}, P0/Z, [X6, X3]    [10]

0x424fbc ADD	X19, X10, X3

0x424fc0 LD1B	{Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X10, X3]    [5]

0x424fc4 LD1B	{Z16.B}, P0/Z, [X1, X3]    [7]

0x424fc8 LD1B	{Z17.B}, P0/Z, [X5, X3]    [1]

0x424fcc LD1B	{Z18.B}, P0/Z, [X2, X3]    [8]

0x424fd0 LD1B	{Z19.B}, P0/Z, [X4, X3]    [9]

0x424fd4 FMUL	Z5.D, Z7.D, Z5.D

0x424fd8 LDR	Z7, [X19, #1, MUL VL]    [3]

0x424fdc FADD	Z2.D, Z4.D, Z2.D

0x424fe0 FADD	Z3.D, Z5.D, Z3.D

0x424fe4 FNMSB	Z6.D, P1/M, Z16.D, Z4.D

0x424fe8 FNMSB	Z7.D, P1/M, Z17.D, Z5.D

0x424fec FADD	Z6.D, Z6.D, Z18.D

0x424ff0 FADD	Z7.D, Z7.D, Z19.D

0x424ff4 ST1B	{Z6.B}, P0, [X2, X3]    [8]

0x424ff8 ST1B	{Z7.B}, P0, [X4, X3]    [9]

0x424ffc ADD	X3, X3, X7

0x425000 B.NE	424fa0

/home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/TwoBodyJastrowRef.h: 342 - 347

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

342:     for (int jat = 0; jat < N; jat++)

343:     {

344:       const valT newg = cur_du_pt[jat] * new_dX[jat];

345:       const valT dg   = newg - old_du_pt[jat] * old_dX[jat];

346:       save_g[jat] -= dg;

347:       cur_g += newg;

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►100.00+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►53.33+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►46.67+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►77.55+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►22.45+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►89.00+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►11.00+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►94.07+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►5.93+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.09+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.91+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.47+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.53+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.24+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.76+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.35+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.65+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►97.90+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►2.10+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

Coverage (%)	Name	Source Location	Module
►98.61+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_thread		libomp.so
○	__kmp_launch_worker(void*)		libomp.so
○	start_thread		libc.so.6
○	thread_start		libc.so.6
►1.39+	qmcplusplus::WaveFunction::acc[...]	NewTimer.h:249	exec
○	main.omp_outlined.62	miniqmc.cpp:450	exec
○	__kmp_invoke_microtask		libomp.so
○	__kmp_invoke_task_func		libomp.so
○	__kmp_fork_call		libomp.so
○	__kmpc_fork_call		libomp.so
○	main	miniqmc.cpp:409	exec
○	__libc_start_call_main		libc.so.6
○	__libc_start_main		libc.so.6
○	_start	new_allocator.h:172	exec

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

min	med	avg	max

Percentile Index	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
Value

Path /

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.50
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	miniqmcreference::TwoBodyJastrowRef >::acceptMove(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet&, int)
Source	TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 8
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	8
CQA cycles	6.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	6.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	6.00
Front-end cycles	3.13
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	4.00
P7 cycles	4.00
P8 cycles	4.00
P9 cycles	4.00
P10 cycles	6.00
P11 cycles	6.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	25.00
Nb uops	25.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	6.67
Nb FLOP add-sub	16.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	8.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	64.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	320.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	10.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	95.24
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	80.00
Vectorization ratio fma	100.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	96.43
Vector-efficiency ratio load	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	85.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Metric	Value
CQA speedup if no scalar integer	1.00
CQA speedup if FP arith vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if fully vectorized	1.00
CQA speedup if no inter-iteration dependency	NA
CQA speedup if next bottleneck killed	1.50
Bottlenecks	P10, P11,
Function	miniqmcreference::TwoBodyJastrowRef >::acceptMove(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet&, int)
Source	TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347
Source loop unroll info	unrolled by 8
Source loop unroll confidence level	max
Unroll/vectorization loop type	NA
Unroll factor	8
CQA cycles	6.00
CQA cycles if no scalar integer	6.00
CQA cycles if FP arith vectorized	6.00
CQA cycles if fully vectorized	6.00
Front-end cycles	3.13
P0 cycles	0.50
P1 cycles	0.50
P2 cycles	1.00
P3 cycles	1.00
P4 cycles	1.00
P5 cycles	1.00
P6 cycles	4.00
P7 cycles	4.00
P8 cycles	4.00
P9 cycles	4.00
P10 cycles	6.00
P11 cycles	6.00
P12 cycles	0.00
P13 cycles	0.00
P14 cycles	0.00
DIV/SQRT cycles	0.00
Inter-iter dependencies cycles	2
FE+BE cycles (UFS)	NA
Stall cycles (UFS)	NA
Nb insns	25.00
Nb uops	25.00
Nb loads	NA
Nb stores	2.00
Nb stack references	0.00
FLOP/cycle	6.67
Nb FLOP add-sub	16.00
Nb FLOP mul	8.00
Nb FLOP fma	8.00
Nb FLOP div	0.00
Nb FLOP rcp	0.00
Nb FLOP sqrt	0.00
Nb FLOP rsqrt	0.00
Bytes/cycle	64.00
Bytes prefetched	0.00
Bytes loaded	320.00
Bytes stored	64.00
Stride 0	0.00
Stride 1	0.00
Stride n	0.00
Stride unknown	10.00
Stride indirect	0.00
Vectorization ratio all	95.24
Vectorization ratio load	100.00
Vectorization ratio store	100.00
Vectorization ratio mul	100.00
Vectorization ratio add_sub	80.00
Vectorization ratio fma	100.00
Vectorization ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vectorization ratio other	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio all	96.43
Vector-efficiency ratio load	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio store	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio mul	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio add_sub	85.00
Vector-efficiency ratio fma	100.00
Vector-efficiency ratio div_sqrt	NA
Vector-efficiency ratio other	NA

Path /

Average path: Display a virtual path defined by average values of all real paths

Function	miniqmcreference::TwoBodyJastrowRef >::acceptMove(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet&, int)
Source file and lines	TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347
Module	exec

The loop is defined in /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/build/miniqmc/src/QMCWaveFunctions/Jastrow/TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347.

The related source loop is unrolled by 8 (including vectorization).

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is highly vectorized. 96% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions).

Details

95% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

80% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.

FMA

Detected 8 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Try to change order in which elements are evaluated (using parentheses) in arithmetic expressions containing both ADD/SUB and MUL operations to enable your compiler to generate FMA instructions wherever possible. For instance a + b*c is a valid FMA (MUL then ADD). However (a+b)* c cannot be translated into an FMA (ADD then MUL).

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 10 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 40 FP arithmetical operations:

24: addition or subtraction (8 inside FMA instructions)
16: multiply (8 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 320 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	25
nb uops	25
loop length	100
used w registers	0
used x registers	13
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	10
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.13 cycles
front end	3.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	4.00	4.00	1.00	1.00	6.00	6.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	6.00	6.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.13
Dispatch	6.00
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	6.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	92%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	95%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	80%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	94%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	96%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	85%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 6.00 cycles. At this rate:

55% of peak load performance is reached (53.33 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
22% of peak store performance is reached (10.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 424fa0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X19, X9, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LD1B {Z4.B}, P0/Z, [X9, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X0, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
SUBS X20, X20, X11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL Z4.D, Z6.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LDR Z5, [X19, #1, MUL VL]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z7.B}, P0/Z, [X6, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X19, X10, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LD1B {Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X10, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z16.B}, P0/Z, [X1, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z17.B}, P0/Z, [X5, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z18.B}, P0/Z, [X2, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z19.B}, P0/Z, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z5.D, Z7.D, Z5.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LDR Z7, [X19, #1, MUL VL]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z2.D, Z4.D, Z2.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z3.D, Z5.D, Z3.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FNMSB Z6.D, P1/M, Z16.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FNMSB Z7.D, P1/M, Z17.D, Z5.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z6.D, Z6.D, Z18.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z7.D, Z7.D, Z19.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1B {Z6.B}, P0, [X2, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1B {Z7.B}, P0, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X3, X3, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
B.NE 424fa0 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17TwoBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE10acceptMoveERNS1_11ParticleSetEi+0x8a0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

Function	miniqmcreference::TwoBodyJastrowRef >::acceptMove(qmcplusplus::ParticleSet&, int)
Source file and lines	TwoBodyJastrowRef.h:342-347
Module	exec

gain
potential
hint
expert

Vectorization

Your loop is highly vectorized. 96% of vector register length is used (average across all VPU instructions).

Details

95% of VPU instructions are used in vector version (process two or more data elements in vector registers):

80% of VPU addition or subtraction instructions are used in vector version.

FMA

Detected 8 FMA (fused multiply-add) operations. Presence of both ADD/SUB and MUL operations.

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Detected data structures (typically arrays) that cannot be efficiently read/written

Details

Constant unknown stride: 10 occurrence(s)

Non-unit stride (uncontiguous) accesses are not efficiently using data caches

Workaround

Try to reorganize arrays of structures to structures of arrays
Consider to permute loops (see vectorization gain report)

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

The binary loop is composed of 40 FP arithmetical operations:

24: addition or subtraction (8 inside FMA instructions)
16: multiply (8 inside FMA instructions)

The binary loop is loading 320 bytes. The binary loop is storing 64 bytes.

Arithmetic intensity

Arithmetic intensity is 0.10 FP operations per loaded or stored byte.

General properties

nb instructions	25
nb uops	25
loop length	100
used w registers	0
used x registers	13
used b registers	0
used h registers	0
used s registers	0
used d registers	0
used q registers	0
used v registers	0
used z registers	10
nb stack references	0
ADD-SUB / MUL ratio	2.00

Front-end

MACRO FUSION NOT POSSIBLE FIT IN UOP CACHE

micro-operation queue	3.13 cycles
front end	3.13 cycles

Back-end

	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	P12	P13	P14
uops	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	4.00	4.00	1.00	1.00	6.00	6.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
cycles	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	6.00	6.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Execution ports to units layout:

P0: BRU
P1: BRU
P2: ALU
P3: ALU
P4: ALU
P5: ALU
P6 (128 bits): VPU, FP store data, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P7 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, FP store data
P8 (128 bits): VPU, ALU, DIV/SQRT
P9 (128 bits): ALU, VPU
P10 (256 bits): store address, load
P11 (256 bits): store address, load
P12 (256 bits): load
P13 (64 bits): store data
P14 (64 bits): store data

Cycles executing div or sqrt instructions	NA
Longest recurrence chain latency (RecMII)	2.00

Cycles summary

Front-end	3.13
Dispatch	6.00
Data deps.	2.00
Overall L1	6.00

Vectorization ratios

INT

all	92%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	0%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	95%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	80%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Vector efficiency ratios

INT

all	94%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	NA (no mul vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
add-sub	25%
fma	NA (no fma vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

all	100%
load	NA (no load vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
store	NA (no store vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
mul	100%
add-sub	100%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

INT+FP

all	96%
load	100%
store	100%
mul	100%
add-sub	85%
fma	100%
div/sqrt	NA (no div/sqrt vectorizable/vectorized instructions)
other	NA (no other vectorizable/vectorized instructions)

Cycles and memory resources usage

Assuming all data fit into the L1 cache, each iteration of the binary loop takes 6.00 cycles. At this rate:

55% of peak load performance is reached (53.33 out of 96.00 bytes loaded per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))
22% of peak store performance is reached (10.67 out of 48.00 bytes stored per cycle (GB/s @ 1GHz))

Front-end bottlenecks

Found no such bottlenecks.

ASM code

In the binary file, the address of the loop is: 424fa0

Instruction	Nb FU	P0	P1	P2	P3	P4	P5	P6	P7	P8	P9	P10	P11	Latency	Recip. throughput	Vectorization
ADD X19, X9, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LD1B {Z4.B}, P0/Z, [X9, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X0, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
SUBS X20, X20, X11	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.33	scal (25.0%)
FMUL Z4.D, Z6.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LDR Z5, [X19, #1, MUL VL]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z7.B}, P0/Z, [X6, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X19, X10, X3	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
LD1B {Z6.B}, P0/Z, [X10, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z16.B}, P0/Z, [X1, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z17.B}, P0/Z, [X5, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z18.B}, P0/Z, [X2, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LD1B {Z19.B}, P0/Z, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FMUL Z5.D, Z7.D, Z5.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	3	0.50	vect (100.0%)
LDR Z7, [X19, #1, MUL VL]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	6	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z2.D, Z4.D, Z2.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z3.D, Z5.D, Z3.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FNMSB Z6.D, P1/M, Z16.D, Z4.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FNMSB Z7.D, P1/M, Z17.D, Z5.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	4	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z6.D, Z6.D, Z18.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
FADD Z7.D, Z7.D, Z19.D	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1B {Z6.B}, P0, [X2, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ST1B {Z7.B}, P0, [X4, X3]	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.50	2	0.50	vect (100.0%)
ADD X3, X3, X7	1	0	0	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.25	N/A
B.NE 424fa0 <_ZN16miniqmcreference17TwoBodyJastrowRefIN11qmcplusplus14BsplineFunctorIdEEE10acceptMoveERNS1_11ParticleSetEi+0x8a0>	1	0.50	0.50	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.50	N/A

▶Scalability Runs Description

Run 1x1	Number processes: 1Number nodes: NARun Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_NUM_THREADS: 1OMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x2	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 2OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x4	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 4OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x8	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 8OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x16	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 16OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x24	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 24OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x32	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 32OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x40	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 40OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x48	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 48OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x56	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 56OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads
Run 1x64	Number processes: 1Run Command: <executable> -g "4 2 2" -bMPI Command: mpirun -n <number_processes> --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=64 --rank-by fill --report-bindings Dataset: Run Directory: /home/eoseret/qaas/qaas_runs/178-212-9071/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_run_1782144418OMP_NUM_THREADS: 64OMP_PROC_BIND: spreadOMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY: TRUEOMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT: 'OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}'OMP_DISPLAY_ENV: TRUEOMP_PLACES: threads

(1x1) Efficiency	(1x1) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x2) Efficiency	(1x2) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x4) Efficiency	(1x4) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x8) Efficiency	(1x8) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x16) Efficiency	(1x16) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x24) Efficiency	(1x24) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x32) Efficiency	(1x32) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x40) Efficiency	(1x40) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x48) Efficiency	(1x48) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x56) Efficiency	(1x56) Potential Speed-Up (%)	(1x64) Efficiency	(1x64) Potential Speed-Up (%)
1	0	0.73	0.05	0.9	0.01	0.88	0.02	0.69	0.04	0.63	0.04	0.52	0.05	0.42	0.07	0.22	0.16	0.19	0.17	0.17	0.18

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency

Run	Number of threads	Efficiency (ideal is 1)	Speedup	Ideal Speedup	Time (s)	Coverage (%)
1x1	1	1	1	1	0.054999995976686	0.12519949674606
1x2	2	0.73	0.73	2	0.079999998211861	0.16939626634121
1x4	4	0.9	0.9	4	0.064999997615814	0.13547176122665
1x8	8	0.88	0.88	8	0.075000002980232	0.12852004170418
1x16	16	0.69	0.69	16	0.11999999731779	0.12384118139744
1x24	24	0.63	0.63	24	0.125	0.11092838644981
1x32	32	0.52	0.52	32	0.15500000119209	0.11422597616911
1x40	40	0.42	0.42	40	0.16999998688698	0.12341222912073
1x48	48	0.22	0.22	48	0.34999999403954	0.20667317509651
1x56	56	0.19	0.19	56	0.39500001072884	0.21171797811985
1x64	64	0.17	0.17	64	0.43000000715256	0.2157319188118

Report Configuration

Vectorization

Details

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

Vectorization

Details

FMA

Workaround

Slow data structures access

Details

Workaround

Matching between your loop (in the source code) and the binary loop

Arithmetic intensity

General properties

Front-end

Back-end

Cycles summary

Vectorization ratios

Vector efficiency ratios

Cycles and memory resources usage

Front-end bottlenecks

ASM code

▶Scalability Runs Description

▼Columns Filter

Speed-Up and Efficiency

▶Detailed Speed-Up and Efficiency