********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.17.7 - bf11934ec971510c7f500e010d8ca2474fd787ed::20230726-123240 || 2023/07/26
maqao OV -S1 --with-FLOPS c=config_par.lua xp=OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi --> /home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/binaries/gmx_mpi
LNK: /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/GROMACS_TestCaseA --> /home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/dataset
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/lib/libgromacs_mpi.so.7 --> /home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/libs/libgromacs_mpi.so.7
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_15" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_16" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_17" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_18" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_19" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_20" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_21" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_22" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_23" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_24" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_25" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_26" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_27" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_28" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_29" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
CMD: OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/tools/lprof_npsu_run_30" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to none" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/install/icx/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -deffnm icx
In run 1x52, 156 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
129 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
35 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 159 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
21 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 157 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
14 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 153 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 161 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 157 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_7, 158 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8, 155 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_9, 159 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_10, 143 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_11, 153 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_12, 148 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_13, 149 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_14, 156 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_15, 150 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16, 149 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_17, 144 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_18, 162 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_19, 149 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_20, 152 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_21, 145 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_22, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_23, 157 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_24, 144 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_25, 153 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26, 148 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_27, 157 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_28, 149 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_29, 152 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_30, 154 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/OV_dirs/OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2/OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.4 - fe14d3adfb3256b508e58d35c4c7bad8c581967c::20240703-182948 || 2024/07/03
/home/eoseret/maqao_fe14d3 OV -refresh xp=OS1_skx_icx_OMP52_altpin2
In run 1x52, 186 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42721157557389% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
157 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.35281158924045% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 180 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4447511373146% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
35 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0086780707351863% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 189 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42857070144964% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
21 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0041329668019899% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 188 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44410495970806% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
14 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0024760930391494% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 184 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4151275344484% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003620824427344% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 190 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42115357246075% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0030860392871546% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 190 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44222221334348% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012707535352092% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_7, 192 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.45675205561565% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00054160322179086% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8, 183 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.40838422364322% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090230721980335% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_9, 195 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.45663283221074% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.001261416633497% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_10, 179 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44160384454881% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090566827566365% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_11, 189 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.47187082993332% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00054258813906927% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_12, 181 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4335628644767% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012719782389467% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_13, 184 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44788270485878% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010840242903214% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_14, 190 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44840410471079% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090222150902265% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_15, 182 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44914459413849% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010901567875408% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.46182465759921% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090482892119325% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_17, 174 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4195733324741% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0009050330845639% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_18, 199 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.48041520197876% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0009050776134245% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_19, 180 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4162460151274% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00054081335838417% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_20, 179 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4089704502403% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00017960932746064% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_21, 179 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44464065530337% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00036208523670212% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_22, 178 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4311829272483% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090432658907955% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_23, 195 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.48263018095167% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00054167250345927% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_24, 176 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42178037489066% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072253600228576% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_25, 188 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.41659401811194% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00017925731663126% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26, 180 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.43760079899221% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010908204421867% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_27, 193 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.46642076323042% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_28, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.45262881828239% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00036282872315496% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_29, 187 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.45543443757924% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0003615994064603% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_30, 188 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.45029134280048% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.000905290216906% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
