********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.7 - b5c28035168f9cf8f9fa5fd6efe26ed8c52734e3::20240731-202858 || 2024/07/31
/home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 OV -R1 c=config_scal.json xp=OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal -WS=strong
CPY: [true] ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi --> /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/binaries/gmx_mpi
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/install_MPI/lib64/libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 --> /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/libs/libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 192" --collect-topology ppn=192 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 1" --collect-topology ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 2" --collect-topology ppn=2 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 4" --collect-topology ppn=4 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 8" --collect-topology ppn=8 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 16" --collect-topology ppn=16 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 32" --collect-topology ppn=32 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 64" --collect-topology ppn=64 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_MPI_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 128" --collect-topology ppn=128 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
In run 192x1, 305 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.59819800997502% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
409 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.61518806146341% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x1, 106 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.33709022577386% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.022192773059942% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 135 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.37284775293665% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0044122912804596% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 152 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42323458875762% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0090372976264917% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 168 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.42511089987238% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
14 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0072737196460366% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 179 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.43153461624752% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.007590670895297% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 220 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4459167549212% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
19 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0057831770100165% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 242 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.46924002247397% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
29 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.006311791788903% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 128x1, 271 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.56795628252439% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
44 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011424463402363% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
