********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.7 - b5c28035168f9cf8f9fa5fd6efe26ed8c52734e3::20240731-202858 || 2024/07/31
/home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 OV -R1 c=config_MPI_scal.json xp=OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm -WS=strong
CPY: [true] ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi --> /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/binaries/gmx_mpi
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/install_MPI_AMD_libm/lib64/libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 --> /home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/libs/libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 192" --collect-topology ppn=192 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 1" --collect-topology ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 2" --collect-topology ppn=2 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 4" --collect-topology ppn=4 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 8" --collect-topology ppn=8 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 16" --collect-topology ppn=16 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 32" --collect-topology ppn=32 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 64" --collect-topology ppn=64 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao_2.20.7 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/gromacs-2024.2/tests/ion/OV1_ZEN4_10K_OMP_scal_AMD_libm/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -genv I_MPI_FABRICS=shm -n 128" --collect-topology ppn=128 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.9.0.0 -- ../../install_MPI_AMD_libm/bin/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 -pin on -deffnm aocc
In run 192x1, 304 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.62263185899064% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
395 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.65547249784868% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x1, 108 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.31539350235835% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
21 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.025832229992375% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 148 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.39247403317131% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
15 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0088321415241807% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 148 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.43038423010148% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014546718157362% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 167 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.4178121171426% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0040484786441084% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 178 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.47544533741893% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
18 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0084973255288787% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 212 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.44692866795231% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0066978587128688% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 243 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.49895813784678% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
33 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0081796619633679% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 128x1, 264 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.56752145029895% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
60 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014358975677169% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
