********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.2 - 4d8b9c1e436de89978b8a89b2318f52a1555c3be::20250303-172211 || 2025/03/03
/home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS=weak -c=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/config.json --replace xp=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/binaries/armclang_5/exec --> /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=40 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=56 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=72 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=80 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=88 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=96 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-161-6712/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_5/oneview_results_1741633338/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
In run 1x1, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.12968514068052% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.033830906148069% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x2, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.083777624182404% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019607528927736% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x4, 28 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.098505700938404% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015285366680473% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x8, 29 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.08542988775298% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011990159749985% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x16, 34 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.14802755974233% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0035526612773538% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x24, 44 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.18263442255557% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0075703393667936% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x32, 54 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.2274836639408% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0090993465855718% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x40, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.19396618090104% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x48, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.18220532761188% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0055213734158315% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x56, 52 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.21954016544623% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015245845424943% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x64, 54 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17738486995222% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0018820676486939% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x72, 53 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.19847438062425% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0025609597214498% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x80, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.19744840014027% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00079137639841064% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x88, 53 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17932192920125% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072453304892406% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x96, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.16890373389469% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010073781595565% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
