********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.1 - e26c8ffcefb997f114892e36591c060f98f53e6a::20240206-190005 || 2024/02/06
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao OV -R1 --with-FLOPS --with-scalability=strong --with-topology c=config_scal.json xp=oneview_results_scal
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/170-859-5251/intel/AMG/run/binaries/gcc_4/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec
CMD: I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=96 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs/AMG/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/compilers/gcc_4/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec -n 320 320 320
In run 2x1, 68 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
36 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 91 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
31 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 97 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 93 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 92 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 111 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
18 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x64, 124 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
13 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x96, 131 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
