********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.4 - 99be6ccf67bfe415248870770db4aebf733f1e82::20240704-151126 || 2024/07/04
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS=weak -c=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/binaries/icx_9/exec --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libkrylov.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libkrylov.so
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libHYPRE_utilities.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libHYPRE_utilities.so
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libseq_mv.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libseq_mv.so
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libIJ_mv.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libIJ_mv.so
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libparcsr_mv.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libparcsr_mv.so
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/build/AMG/../icx_9/libparcsr_ls.so --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/libs/libparcsr_ls.so
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -ldi=libkrylov.so,libHYPRE_utilities.so,libseq_mv.so,libIJ_mv.so,libparcsr_mv.so,libparcsr_ls.so -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/172-019-1763/intel/AMG/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_9/oneview_results_1720211326/binaries/exec -n 400 400 400
In run 8x1, 187 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.32308450283017% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
98 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.13141784687468% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x2, 199 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.33891524834326% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
42 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012579824862769% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x4, 209 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.33866098319413% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
29 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0045278316683834% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x8, 210 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.31714748110971% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
15 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015778056404088% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x16, 230 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.2722665178444% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00085948197011021% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x24, 233 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.25218833916369% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
19 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00074324635716039% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
