options

Stylizer

gcc_2icx_5

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 3.00 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=graniterapids is used

[ 3.00 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x GRANITERAPIDS is used

[ 3.00 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer

-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.

[ 3.00 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer

-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (28.83 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (31.11 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used

[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer

gcc_2icx_5

[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good

CPU cores are active 98.96% of time

[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good

CPU cores are active 98.60% of time

[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.68%)

Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned

[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.75%)

Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (94.86%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (93.45%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.18%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (94.69%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.01%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (93.44%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 97.12% of observed threads are actually active

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 96.93% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (94.69%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (93.44%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (6.04%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (5.95%), representing an hotspot for the application

Optimizer

Analysisr_1r_2
Loop Computation IssuesPresence of expensive FP instructions99
Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA22
Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions010
Control Flow IssuesPresence of 2 to 4 paths07
Presence of more than 4 paths03
Data Access IssuesPresence of constant non-unit stride data access10
Presence of indirect access27
Presence of expensive instructions: scatter/gather20
Presence of special instructions executing on a single port22
More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack310
Vectorization RoadblocksPresence of 2 to 4 paths07
Presence of more than 4 paths03
Presence of constant non-unit stride data access10
Presence of indirect access27
Inefficient VectorizationPresence of expensive instructions: scatter/gather20
Presence of special instructions executing on a single port22
Use of masked instructions23
×