********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - 8271f65b618decdd516f3bd4a943e5566ffabed6::20250211-191351 || 2025/02/11
/home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/binaries/gcc_2/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=18 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=36 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-369-0250/intel/CloverLeaf2.0-CXX/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_2/oneview_results_1743722721/binaries/exec
In run 2x1, 82 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.12974845773715% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
70 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.064081227115821% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 76 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.12991088544368% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
19 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0062175564526114% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 82 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.14174821205961% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0028970687708352% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 84 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15441817957617% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00051536352839321% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 93 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.16813305915275% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00057773415028351% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x18, 92 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15315224621736% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00010610338358674% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x24, 90 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1582667016919% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00058837566757575% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 92 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15908391722769% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00039462296990678% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x36, 95 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15964370666916% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00035479177313391% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
