********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - 8271f65b618decdd516f3bd4a943e5566ffabed6::20250211-191351 || 2025/02/11
/home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/base_runs/defaults/gcc/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=18 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=36 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9946/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc/oneview_results_1744122752/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100 --xproc=2 --yproc=1 --zproc=1
In run 2x1, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037951737642288% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.06325385713717% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.03780333918985% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0047251743962988% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.041377544170246% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.006244590098504% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 14 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.051277035847306% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00076562480535358% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.030864886124618% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0051441512769088% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x18, 14 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.022502077976242% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0029032193706371% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x24, 14 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.042675344157033% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013766445918009% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039817864482757% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012248590355739% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x36, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.034600895131007% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0023453829344362% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
