********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.2 - 4d8b9c1e436de89978b8a89b2318f52a1555c3be::20250303-172211 || 2025/03/03
/home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/config.json --replace xp=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/binaries/gcc_1/exec --> /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=40 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=56 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=72 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=80 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=88 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=96 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-108-7908/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/gcc_1/oneview_results_1741097920/binaries/exec -x 100 -y 100 -z 100
In run 1x1, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.057764128781855% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.041925577679649% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x2, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.050469635694753% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.020561703655403% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x4, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.072761886753142% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x8, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0707213828573% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00093054451281205% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x16, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.046237234317232% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0027742341044359% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x24, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.067720362683758% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0036605600034818% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x32, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.052666476054583% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0036321708466858% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x40, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.062268730718643% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00090244534658268% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x48, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.059123337094206% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00089580815983936% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x56, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.058749194373377% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.001780278631486% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x64, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.072398536896799% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00088290899293497% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x72, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.042906788410619% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0017512976191938% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x80, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.054093651473522% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0017449565930292% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x88, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.06944808922708% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0026043032412417% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x96, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045020844612736% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
