Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (15.51 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3.00 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3.00 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3.00 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=haswell is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.32 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (81.92%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (56.34%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (73.02%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (8.90%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (73.02%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.18%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
►25 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 13 | 56.34 | 0 | 12.5 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (9 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 9 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 13 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
○16 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 8.69 | 0 | 6.25 |
►24 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 46 | 4.74 | 0 | 12.32 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (40 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 40 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 44 | ||||
○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
○18 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 2.77 | 0 | 12.5 |
►61 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 10 | 2.5 | 0 | 10.94 |
○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 5 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 10 | ||||
►17 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 22 | 2.49 | 0 | 12.41 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 | ||||
○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
►20 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 8 | 2.28 | 0 | 12.5 |
○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
►19 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 14 | 1.26 | 0 | 12.15 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (8 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 8 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 12 | ||||
○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
►23 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 47 | 0.27 | 20 | 12.5 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (41 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 41 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 45 | ||||
○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
►28 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 8 | 0.19 | 0 | 12.5 |
○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 |