********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - d7816a4ef31d96c8cb7cb54a3ec2554ac0d7ef52::20250912-183832 || 2025/09/12
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/config.json --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 128 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 160 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-2578/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758051880/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
In run 8x1, 39 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.050979046187422% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
63 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.04942212910828% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 41 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.017168693106214% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
71 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0059890791926591% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 41 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.016942983515037% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
47 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0021348159716581% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 128x1, 45 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015181390044745% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
42 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014073478159844% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 160x1, 43 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.013082384501104% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
46 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014967133938626% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014188689980074% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
45 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013301896869962% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
