********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.2 - 4d8b9c1e436de89978b8a89b2318f52a1555c3be::20250303-172211 || 2025/03/03
/home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/config.json --replace xp=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/binaries/armclang_3/exec --> /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=40 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=56 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=72 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=80 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=88 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=96 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-118-5752/intel/TeaLeaf/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang_3/oneview_results_1741271023/binaries/exec
In run 1x1, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.065391785115935% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
38 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.082533320615767% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x2, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.068468335841317% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
28 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.033769451401895% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x4, 23 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.063994141179137% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0050133658805862% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x8, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.055324505738099% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0097100149141624% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x16, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.057933658710681% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00043778584222309% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x24, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.035379579807341% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00040666185668668% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x32, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.071429799689213% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00023522436094936% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x40, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.051197109845816% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00019615751079982% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x48, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037898901537119% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 5.8127148804488e-05% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x56, 23 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.054017324320739% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x64, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045157163200202% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 4.7384222852997e-05% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x72, 23 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026859048768529% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00017244975606445% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x80, 23 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.04679622007825% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 3.9423943235306e-05% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x88, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044682086947432% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00014530759654008% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x96, 23 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.040741884469753% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 3.4122182114515e-05% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
