Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (63.32 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=sapphirerapids is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (96.09%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (84.50%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (11.45%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 0 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (84.64%) greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage (11.45%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►2045 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 22 | 84.5 | 5.56 | 13.19 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
| ○1905 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 4.72 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○1832 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 4.5 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ►2201 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 16 | 1.76 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 6 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 12 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ○1978 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ►2200 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 24 | 0.07 | 0 | 12.03 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 7 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 14 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►2046 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 22 | 0.06 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
| ►2199 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 11 | 0.01 | 0 | 12.25 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 |