Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (15.98 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.
[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information
Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.
[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor
Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 1.94 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (97.77%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (33.11%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (64.57%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (33.20%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (64.57%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►31 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 14 | 33.11 | 13.33 | 14.17 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 5 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 10 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►32 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 2 | 18.59 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ○33 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 18.4 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ►17 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 36 | 17.12 | 11.11 | 13.89 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 9 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 36 | ||||
| ►26 | exec | The loop is fully and efficiently vectorized. | 0 | 9.08 | 100 | 100 |
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ○21 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 1.25 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ►28 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 8 | 0.13 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 6 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ►35 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 15 | 0.06 | 0 | 11.51 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (9 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 9 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 13 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
| ►18 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 24 | 0.03 | 0 | 11.61 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 7 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 14 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |