********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - 8271f65b618decdd516f3bd4a943e5566ffabed6::20250211-191351 || 2025/02/11
/home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS=weak -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/binaries/icx_2/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=18 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=36 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_8360Y/174-411-9252/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1744135540/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
In run 2x1, 38 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.091729473788292% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
39 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.14065614948049% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 45 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.13065363094211% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047509524272755% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.10920575191267% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.059699873323552% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 56 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1405131938518% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
23 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.022562769474462% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 68 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.16711570906045% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
34 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012423697306076% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x18, 68 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1659778165631% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
15 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0040043842600425% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x24, 76 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1594037207833% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
26 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0039673907449469% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 77 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15857790266455% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
23 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019014966310351% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x36, 76 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1489197714036% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0011247355650994% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
