********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.2 - 4d8b9c1e436de89978b8a89b2318f52a1555c3be::20250303-172211 || 2025/03/03
/home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS=weak -c=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/config.json --replace xp=/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=40 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=56 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=72 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=80 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=88 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=96 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/hbollore/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by package:PE=96 --rank-by fill --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/hbollore/qaas/qaas-runs/174-135-6342/intel/miniqmc/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1741388363/binaries/exec -g \"4 2 2\" -b
In run 1x2, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.091506339609622% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
23 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.13154036318883% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x4, 35 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15037177316845% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
27 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.10024784738198% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x8, 42 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15112319635227% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
19 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.042991943657398% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x16, 57 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.18342220736668% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
24 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028728778706864% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x24, 67 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17424552081502% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
21 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0079959703143686% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x32, 65 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.15395374165382% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0026392070576549% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x40, 75 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1782973685913% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0017558379477123% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x48, 71 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17156108464405% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0018355322390562% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x56, 78 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17210441816133% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00086581314099022% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x64, 76 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17033542612626% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00038554873754037% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x72, 83 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.17135828272149% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00018969552183989% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x80, 86 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.19333573826589% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00015765349235153% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x88, 84 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.1797637789241% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00058350292601972% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 1x96, 94 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.18039456754559% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00042041109190905% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
