Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (129.11 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 2.61 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 2.61 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 2.61 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=native is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (17.75%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat
No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 2.86%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (16.64%)
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (17.07%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.68%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (17.07%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
►305 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 6 | 2.86 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 | ||||
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►329 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 2.54 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►271 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 8 | 1.9 | 50 | 18.75 |
○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 8 | ||||
►328 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 1.65 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►327 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 1.59 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►326 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 1.54 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►229 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 66 | 0.62 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 16 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 64 | ||||
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
○220 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected | 0 | 0.57 | 80 | 42.5 |
►996 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 52 | 0.47 | 100 | 46.67 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive instructions (GATHER/SCATTER) - Use array restructuring. There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 16 | ||||
○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►298 | libqmckl.so.0.0.0 | Inefficient vectorization. | 6 | 0.43 | 100 | 50 |
○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 | ||||
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 |