Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 0 / 4 ] Application profile is too short (8.95 s)
If the overall application profiling time is less than 10 seconds, many of the measurements at function or loop level will very likely be under the measurement quality threshold (0,1 seconds). Rerun to increase runtime duration: for example use a larger dataset, include a repetition loop or change profile_start settings.
[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.
[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information
Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g and -grecord-gcc-switches) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g and -grecord-gcc-switches are present. Remark: if -g and -grecord-gcc-switches are indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.
[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor
Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 0 / 0 ] Fastmath not used
Consider to add ffast-math to compilation flags (or replace -O3 with -Ofast) to unlock potential extra speedup by relaxing floating-point computation consistency. Warning: floating-point accuracy may be reduced and the compliance to IEEE/ISO rules/specifications for math functions will be relaxed, typically 'errno' will no longer be set after calling some math functions.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (96.43%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good
CPU cores are active 99.48% of time
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 99.48% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.95%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (48.30%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (96.43%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.00%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (96.43%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 980 - bench | Execution Time: 48 % - Vectorization Ratio: 98.34 % - Vector Length Use: 44.94 % | |
| ►Data Access Issues | 59 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 6 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (INSERT/EXTRACT, SHUFFLE/PERM, BROADCAST) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 53 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 53 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 6 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 53 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (INSERT/EXTRACT, SHUFFLE/PERM, BROADCAST) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 53 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 53 |
| ►Loop 1440 - bench | Execution Time: 47 % - Vectorization Ratio: 100.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 % | |
| ►Data Access Issues | 14 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 10 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 10 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 4 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 10 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 10 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 10 |
| ►Loop 256 - bench | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 1 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 3 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 2 |
| ►Loop 57 - bench | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 1 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 1 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |