********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - 8271f65b618decdd516f3bd4a943e5566ffabed6::20250211-191351 || 2025/02/11
/home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/config.json --replace xp=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/base_runs/defaults/icx/exec --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=12 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=20 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=28 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO_277466/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/174-043-3878/intel/CoMD/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1740438801/binaries/exec -x 200 -y 200 -z 200 --xproc=2 --yproc=2 --zproc=2
In run 8x1, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045029412693111% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
30 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044528426384204% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x12, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.036444525780098% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011163852141181% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x16, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045965479330334% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0022223834821489% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x20, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.071053557170671% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00080716657976154% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x24, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.068403254263103% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00059236920787953% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x28, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.061531258303148% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0002338515187148% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x32, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.054366543183278% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00036094740789849% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
