********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - d7816a4ef31d96c8cb7cb54a3ec2554ac0d7ef52::20250912-183832 || 2025/09/12
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 120 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 126 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 144 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 168 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 216 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 240 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 256 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-803-9958/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758062206/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
In run 6x1, 35 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01685845742395% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
66 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.03881523898599% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014842599248368% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
114 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0091295988295315% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 120x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.018826402869308% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
60 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0021070247621537% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 126x1, 52 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014921579684597% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
49 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015231858269545% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 144x1, 52 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014530231250319% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
50 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012895292984467% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 168x1, 54 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014177035434841% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
66 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0017118529194704% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 61 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015620486195985% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
57 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013034879157203% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 216x1, 58 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015658758806239% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
57 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014470853639068% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 240x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0088128370061895% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
63 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014579261533072% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 256x1, 48 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0067487613323465% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
56 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012015598967991% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
